Literature DB >> 21047592

Latest results from the UK trials evaluating prostate cancer screening and treatment: the CAP and ProtecT studies.

J A Lane1, F C Hamdy, R M Martin, E L Turner, D E Neal, J L Donovan.   

Abstract

The European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) demonstrated a significant reduction in prostate cancer-specific mortality. The ongoing Comparison Arm for ProtecT (CAP) cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluates prostate cancer screening effectiveness by comparing primary care centres allocated to a round of prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing (intervention) or standard clinical care. Over 550 centres (around 450,000 men) were randomised in eight United Kingdom areas (2002-2008). Intervention group participants were also eligible for the ProtecT (Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment) RCT evaluating active monitoring, radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy treatments for localised prostate cancer. In ProtecT, over 1500 of around 3000 men with prostate cancer were randomised from over 10,000 with an elevated PSA in around 111,000 attendees at clinics. Investigation of the psychological impact of screening in a sub-sample showed that 10% of men still experienced high distress up to 3 months following prostate biopsies (22/227), although most were relatively unaffected. The risk of prostate cancer with a raised PSA was lower if urinary symptoms were present (frequent nocturia odds ratio (OR) 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-0.83) or if a repeat PSA decreased by > or = 20% prior to biopsy (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.35-0.52). Men aged 45-49 years attended PSA clinics less frequently (442/1299, 34%) in a nested cohort with a cancer detection rate of 2.3% (10/442). The CAP and ProtecT trials (ISRCTN92187251 and ISRCTN20141217) will help resolve the prostate cancer screening debate, define the optimum treatment for localised disease and generate evidence to improve men's health.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21047592     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  45 in total

Review 1.  Management of low (favourable)-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Modeling grade progression in an active surveillance study.

Authors:  Lurdes Y T Inoue; Bruce J Trock; Alan W Partin; Herbert B Carter; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  High-risk prostate cancer-classification and therapy.

Authors:  Albert J Chang; Karen A Autio; Mack Roach; Howard I Scher
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 4.  The status of surgery in the management of high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christian Bach; Sailaja Pisipati; Datesh Daneshwar; Mark Wright; Edward Rowe; David Gillatt; Raj Persad; Anthony Koupparis
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Associations of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D with prostate cancer diagnosis, stage and grade.

Authors:  Rebecca Gilbert; Chris Metcalfe; William D Fraser; Jenny Donovan; Freddie Hamdy; David E Neal; J Athene Lane; Richard M Martin
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 6.  Randomized controlled screening trials for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen: a tale of contrasts.

Authors:  Kyle O Rove; E David Crawford
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Circulating insulin-like growth factors and IGF-binding proteins in PSA-detected prostate cancer: the large case-control study ProtecT.

Authors:  Mari-Anne Rowlands; Jeff M P Holly; David Gunnell; Jenny Donovan; J Athene Lane; Freddie Hamdy; David E Neal; Steven Oliver; George Davey Smith; Richard M Martin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Risk perception and psychological morbidity in men at elevated risk for prostate cancer.

Authors:  A G Matthew; T Davidson; S Ochs; K L Currie; A Petrella; A Finelli
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  Reassessing the Association between Circulating Vitamin D and IGFBP-3: Observational and Mendelian Randomization Estimates from Independent Sources.

Authors:  Vanessa Y Tan; Kalina M Biernacka; Tom Dudding; Carolina Bonilla; Rebecca Gilbert; Robert C Kaplan; Qi Qibin; Alexander Teumer; Richard M Martin; Claire M Perks; Nicholas J Timpson; Jeff M P Holly
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  The comparative oncologic effectiveness of available management strategies for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mark D Tyson; David F Penson; Matthew J Resnick
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.498

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.