Literature DB >> 26715884

Risk perception and psychological morbidity in men at elevated risk for prostate cancer.

A G Matthew1, T Davidson1, S Ochs1, K L Currie1, A Petrella1, A Finelli1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: As prostate-specific antigen (psa) makes prostate cancer (pca) screening more accessible, more men are being identified with conditions that indicate high risk for developing pca, such as elevated psa and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (hgpin). In the present study, we assessed psychological well-being and risk perception in individuals with those high-risk conditions.
METHODS: A questionnaire consisting of a psychological symptom survey, a trait risk-aversion survey, and a cancer-specific risk perception survey was administered to 168 patients with early-stage localized pca and 69 patients at high risk for pca (n = 16 hgpin, n = 53 psa > 4 ng/mL). Analysis of variance was used to examine differences in psychological well-being and appraisal of risk between the groups.
RESULTS: Compared with the pca group, the high-risk group perceived their risk of dying from something other than pca to be significantly lower (p = 0.007). However, pca patients reported significantly more clinically important psychological symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: The identification of prostate conditions that predict progression to cancer might not result in the psychological symptoms commonly experienced by pca patients, but does appear to be related to a distorted perception of the disease's mortal risk. Patients with pca experience reduced psychological well-being, but better understand the risks of pca recurrence and death. Education on the risks and outcomes of pca can help at-risk men to view health assessments with reduced worry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prostate cancer; elevated psa; hgpin; psychological well-being; risk perception

Year:  2015        PMID: 26715884      PMCID: PMC4687672          DOI: 10.3747/co.22.2679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  40 in total

1.  Risk perception, screening practice and interest in genetic testing among unaffected men in families with hereditary prostate cancer.

Authors:  O Bratt; J E Damber; M Emanuelsson; U Kristoffersson; R Lundgren; H Olsson; H Grönberg
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  A qualitative analysis of interviews of men with early stage prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Lifestyle Trial.

Authors:  Carol Kronenwetter; Gerdi Weidner; Elaine Pettengill; Ruth Marlin; Lila Crutchfield; Patricia McCormac; Caren J Raisin; Dean Ornish
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.592

3.  Risk perception measures' associations with behavior intentions, affect, and cognition following colon cancer screening messages.

Authors:  Amanda J Dillard; Rebecca A Ferrer; Peter A Ubel; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 4.  Treatment of men with rising prostate-specific antigen levels following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Katherine Tzou; Winston W Tan; Steven Buskirk
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.512

5.  Health perceptions in patients who undergo screening and workup for prostate cancer.

Authors:  David A Katz; David F Jarrard; Colleen A McHorney; Stephen L Hillis; Donald A Wiebe; Dennis G Fryback
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 6.  Risk stratification in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Monique J Roobol; Sigrid V Carlsson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Impact of prostate cancer testing: an evaluation of the emotional consequences of a negative biopsy result.

Authors:  R C Macefield; C Metcalfe; J A Lane; J L Donovan; K N L Avery; J M Blazeby; L Down; D E Neal; F C Hamdy; K Vedhara
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Anxiety associated with prostate cancer screening with special reference to men with a positive screening test (elevated PSA) - Results from a prospective, population-based, randomised study.

Authors:  Sigrid Carlsson; Gunnar Aus; Catrin Wessman; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Risk perception and concern among brothers of men with prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer; David P Wood; Stephen B Gruber; Doug M Chilson; Kimberly A Zuhlke; Gina B Claeys; Kathleen A Cooney
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Treatment of local-regional prostate cancer detected by PSA screening: benefits and harms according to prognostic factors.

Authors:  E M Wever; E A M Heijnsdijk; G Draisma; C H Bangma; M J Roobol; F H Schröder; H J de Koning
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Appraising risk in active surveillance of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anne Hogden; Kate Churruca; Frances Rapport; David Gillatt
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.377

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.