Enrique M Muro1, Miguel A Andrade-Navarro. 1. Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert Rössle Str, 10, 13125 Berlin, Germany. enrique.muro@mdc-berlin.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Naturally occurring antisense transcripts (NATs) are non-coding RNAs that may regulate the activity of sense transcripts to which they bind because of complementarity. NATs that are not located in the gene they regulate (trans-NATs) have better chances to evolve than cis-NATs, which is evident when the sense strand of the cis-NAT is part of a protein coding gene. However, the generation of a trans-NAT requires the formation of a relatively large region of complementarity to the gene it regulates. RESULTS: Pseudogene formation may be one evolutionary mechanism that generates trans-NATs to the parental gene. For example, this could occur if the parental gene is regulated by a cis-NAT that is copied as a trans-NAT in the pseudogene. To support this we identified human pseudogenes with a trans-NAT to the parental gene in their antisense strand by analysis of the database of expressed sequence tags (ESTs). We found that the mutations that appeared in these trans-NATs after the pseudogene formation do not show the flat distribution that would be expected in a non functional transcript. Instead, we found higher similarity to the parental gene in a region nearby the 3' end of the trans-NATs. CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not imply a functional relation of the trans-NAT arising from pseudogenes over their respective parental genes but add evidence for it and stress the importance of duplication mechanisms of genetic material in the generation of non-coding RNAs. We also provide a plausible explanation for the large transcripts that can be found in the antisense strand of some pseudogenes.
BACKGROUND: Naturally occurring antisense transcripts (NATs) are non-coding RNAs that may regulate the activity of sense transcripts to which they bind because of complementarity. NATs that are not located in the gene they regulate (trans-NATs) have better chances to evolve than cis-NATs, which is evident when the sense strand of the cis-NAT is part of a protein coding gene. However, the generation of a trans-NAT requires the formation of a relatively large region of complementarity to the gene it regulates. RESULTS: Pseudogene formation may be one evolutionary mechanism that generates trans-NATs to the parental gene. For example, this could occur if the parental gene is regulated by a cis-NAT that is copied as a trans-NAT in the pseudogene. To support this we identified human pseudogenes with a trans-NAT to the parental gene in their antisense strand by analysis of the database of expressed sequence tags (ESTs). We found that the mutations that appeared in these trans-NATs after the pseudogene formation do not show the flat distribution that would be expected in a non functional transcript. Instead, we found higher similarity to the parental gene in a region nearby the 3' end of the trans-NATs. CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not imply a functional relation of the trans-NAT arising from pseudogenes over their respective parental genes but add evidence for it and stress the importance of duplication mechanisms of genetic material in the generation of non-coding RNAs. We also provide a plausible explanation for the large transcripts that can be found in the antisense strand of some pseudogenes.
Authors: Deyou Zheng; Adam Frankish; Robert Baertsch; Philipp Kapranov; Alexandre Reymond; Siew Woh Choo; Yontao Lu; France Denoeud; Stylianos E Antonarakis; Michael Snyder; Yijun Ruan; Chia-Lin Wei; Thomas R Gingeras; Roderic Guigó; Jennifer Harrow; Mark B Gerstein Journal: Genome Res Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Enrique M Muro; Robert Herrington; Salima Janmohamed; Catherine Frelin; Miguel A Andrade-Navarro; Norman N Iscove Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-12-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Oliver H Tam; Alexei A Aravin; Paula Stein; Angelique Girard; Elizabeth P Murchison; Sihem Cheloufi; Emily Hodges; Martin Anger; Ravi Sachidanandam; Richard M Schultz; Gregory J Hannon Journal: Nature Date: 2008-04-10 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Lei Nie; Hsing-Ju Wu; Jung-Mao Hsu; Shih-Shin Chang; Adam M Labaff; Chia-Wei Li; Yan Wang; Jennifer L Hsu; Mien-Chie Hung Journal: Am J Transl Res Date: 2012-04-08 Impact factor: 4.060
Authors: Cinthya J Zepeda-Mendoza; Jonas Ibn-Salem; Tammy Kammin; David J Harris; Debra Rita; Karen W Gripp; Jennifer J MacKenzie; Andrea Gropman; Brett Graham; Ranad Shaheen; Fowzan S Alkuraya; Campbell K Brasington; Edward J Spence; Diane Masser-Frye; Lynne M Bird; Erica Spiegel; Rebecca L Sparkes; Zehra Ordulu; Michael E Talkowski; Miguel A Andrade-Navarro; Peter N Robinson; Cynthia C Morton Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Paul F Bray; Steven E McKenzie; Leonard C Edelstein; Srikanth Nagalla; Kathleen Delgrosso; Adam Ertel; Joan Kupper; Yi Jing; Eric Londin; Phillipe Loher; Huang-Wen Chen; Paolo Fortina; Isidore Rigoutsos Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2013-01-16 Impact factor: 3.969