Literature DB >> 21046413

A grading system can predict clinical and economic outcomes of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results in 755 consecutive patients.

Despoina Daskalaki1, Giovanni Butturini, Enrico Molinari, Stefano Crippa, Paolo Pederzoli, Claudio Bassi.   

Abstract

AIM: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) has a wide range of clinical and economical implications due to the difference of the associated complications and management. The aim of this study is to verify the applicability of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) definition and its capability to predict hospital costs.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study based on prospectively collected data of 755 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in our institution between November 1996 and October 2006. A number of 147 patients (19.5%) have developed a POPF according to ISGPF definition.
RESULTS: Grade A fistula, which has no clinical impact, occurred in 19% of all cases. Grade B occurred in 70.7% and was successfully managed with conservative therapy or mini-invasive procedures. Grade C (8.8%) was associated to severe clinical complications and required invasive therapy. Pulmonary complications were statistically higher in the groups B and C rather than the group A POPFs (p < 0.005; OR 8). Patients with carcinoma of the ampullary region had a higher incidence of POPF compared to ductal cancer, with a predominance of grade A (p = 0.036). Increasing fistula grades have higher hospital costs (€11,654, €25,698, and €59,492 for grades A, B, and C, respectively; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The development of a POPF does not always determine a substantial change of the postoperative management. Clinically relevant fistulas can be treated conservatively in most cases. Higher fistula severity corresponds to increased costs. The grading system proposed by the ISGPF allows a correct stratification of the complicated patients based on the real clinical and economic impact of the POPF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21046413     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-010-0719-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  24 in total

1.  Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Giovanni Butturini; Enrico Molinari; Giuseppe Mascetta; Roberto Salvia; Massimo Falconi; Andrew Gumbs; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2003-12-30       Impact factor: 2.588

2.  CT features of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Manabu Hashimoto; Makoto Koga; Koichi Ishiyama; Jiro Watarai; Satoshi Shibata; Tutomu Sato; Yuzo Yamamoto
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Massimo Falconi; Enrico Molinari; Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini; Nora Sartori; William Mantovani; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Proposal for definition and severity grading of pancreatic anastomosis failure and pancreatic occlusion failure.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; David C Linehan; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Jeffrey S Barkun
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula.

Authors:  John W Lin; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Taylor S Riall; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the problem of current definitions.

Authors:  Giovanni Butturini; Stefano Marcucci; Enrico Molinari; Giuseppe Mascetta; Luca Landoni; Stefano Crippa; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2006

7.  Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Michelle L DeOliveira; Jordan M Winter; Markus Schafer; Steven C Cunningham; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Conservative management of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy.

Authors:  Nicolas Munoz-Bongrand; Alain Sauvanet; Alban Denys; Annie Sibert; Valérie Vilgrain; Jacques Belghiti
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Utility of CT in the diagnosis of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with soft pancreas.

Authors:  Onorina Bruno; Giuseppe Brancatelli; Alain Sauvanet; Marie Pierre Vullierme; Vincent Barrau; Valérie Vilgrain
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  C J Yeo; J L Cameron; M M Maher; P K Sauter; M L Zahurak; M A Talamini; K D Lillemoe; H A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  14 in total

1.  Drain amylase value as an early predictor of pancreatic fistula after cephalic duodenopancreatectomy.

Authors:  Vladimir D Dugalic; Djordje M Knezevic; Vladan N Obradovic; Miroslava G Gojnic-Dugalic; Slavko V Matic; Aleksandra R Pavlovic-Markovic; Predrag D Dugalic; Srbislav M Knezevic
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Preoperative imaging evaluation of pancreatic pathologies for the objective prediction of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yoshitsugu Tajima; Yasunari Kawabata; Noriyuki Hirahara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Risk-stratified clinical pathways decrease the duration of hospitalization and costs of perioperative care after pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Jason W Denbo; Morgan Bruno; Whitney Dewhurst; Michael P Kim; Ching-Wei Tzeng; Thomas A Aloia; Jose Soliz; Barbara Bryce Speer; Jeffrey E Lee; Matthew H G Katz
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 4.  Cost-effectiveness comparison of prophylactic octreotide and pasireotide for prevention of fistula after pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Thilo Welsch; Benjamin Müssle; Marius Distler; Holger Knoth; Jürgen Weitz; Dennis Häckl
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Selective Perioperative Administration of Pasireotide is More Cost-Effective Than Routine Administration for Pancreatic Fistula Prophylaxis.

Authors:  Jason W Denbo; Rebecca S Slack; Morgan Bruno; Jordan M Cloyd; Laura Prakash; Jason B Fleming; Michael P Kim; Thomas A Aloia; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Jeffrey E Lee; Matthew H G Katz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  [Management of postoperative pancreatic fistula].

Authors:  T Hackert; M W Büchler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  Is routine drainage necessary after pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Authors:  Qiang Wang; Yong-Jian Jiang; Ji Li; Feng Yang; Yang Di; Lie Yao; Chen Jin; De-Liang Fu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Serum amylase on the night of surgery predicts clinically significant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Lavanniya K Palani Velu; Vishnu V Chandrabalan; Salman Jabbar; Donald C McMillan; Colin J McKay; C Ross Carter; Nigel B Jamieson; Euan J Dickson
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Current state of surgical management of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Thilo Hackert; Markus W Büchler; Jens Werner
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Pancreatic Remnant Occlusion after Whipple's Procedure: An Alternative Oncologically Safe Method.

Authors:  Theodosios Theodosopoulos; Dionysios Dellaportas; Anneza I Yiallourou; George Gkiokas; George Polymeneas; Alexios Fotopoulos
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2013-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.