Literature DB >> 21046368

Assessment of across-muscle coherence using multi-unit vs. single-unit recordings.

Jamie A Johnston1, Gabriele Formicone, Thomas M Hamm, Marco Santello.   

Abstract

Coherence between electromyographic (EMG) signals has been used to identify correlated neural inputs to motor units (MUs) innervating different muscles. Simulations using a motor-unit model (Fuglevand et al. 1992) were performed to determine the ability of coherence between two multi-unit EMGs (mEMG) to detect correlated MU activity and the range of correlation strengths in which mEMG coherence can be usefully employed. Coherence between motor-unit and mEMG activities in two muscles was determined as we varied the strength of a 30-Hz periodic common input, the number of correlated MU pairs and variability of MU discharge relative to the common input. Pooled and mEMG coherence amplitudes positively and negatively accelerated, respectively, toward the strongest and most widespread correlating inputs. Furthermore, the relation between pooled and mEMG coherence was also nonlinear and was essentially the same whether correlation strength varied by changing common input strength or its distribution. However, the most important finding is that while the mEMG coherence saturates at the strongest common input strengths, this occurs at common input strengths greater than found in most physiological studies. Thus, we conclude that mEMG coherence would be a useful measure in many experimental conditions and our simulation results suggest further guidelines for using and interpreting coherence between mEMG signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21046368      PMCID: PMC5706539          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2455-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  50 in total

1.  Experimental simulation of cat electromyogram: evidence for algebraic summation of motor-unit action-potential trains.

Authors:  S J Day; M Hulliger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Motor unit synchronisation is enhanced during slow lengthening contractions of a hand muscle.

Authors:  John G Semmler; Kurt W Kornatz; Devin V Dinenno; Shi Zhou; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Motor-unit coherence during isometric contractions is greater in a hand muscle of older adults.

Authors:  John G Semmler; Kurt W Kornatz; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Role of across-muscle motor unit synchrony for the coordination of forces.

Authors:  Marco Santello; Andrew J Fuglevand
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Coherence between motor unit discharges in response to shared neural inputs.

Authors:  Madeleine M Lowery; Lance J Myers; Zeynep Erim
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Rectification of the EMG signal impairs the identification of oscillatory input to the muscle.

Authors:  Osmar Pinto Neto; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Common synaptic input across motor nuclei supplying intrinsic muscles involved in the precision grip.

Authors:  Tara L McIsaac; Andrew J Fuglevand
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Cross-correlation functions for a neuronal model.

Authors:  C K Knox
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Coupling of antagonistic ankle muscles during co-contraction in humans.

Authors:  S Hansen; N L Hansen; L O D Christensen; N T Petersen; J B Nielsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-08-10       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The synaptic connexions to intercostal motoneurones as revealed by the average common excitation potential.

Authors:  P A Kirkwood; T A Sears
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  4 in total

1.  Assessment of across-muscle coherence using multi-unit vs. single-unit recordings.

Authors:  Jamie A Johnston; Gabriele Formicone; Thomas M Hamm; Marco Santello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Modifying motor unit territory placement in the Fuglevand model.

Authors:  Jason W Robertson; Jamie A Johnston
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Hand dominance during constant force isometric contractions: evidence of different cortical drive commands.

Authors:  Rafael Pereira; Ivna Vidal Freire; Cláudia Virgínia Galindo Cavalcanti; Carla Patrícia Novais Luz; Osmar Pinto Neto
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Neural bases of hand synergies.

Authors:  Marco Santello; Gabriel Baud-Bovy; Henrik Jörntell
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 2.380

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.