Literature DB >> 20032241

Rectification of the EMG signal impairs the identification of oscillatory input to the muscle.

Osmar Pinto Neto1, Evangelos A Christou.   

Abstract

Rectification of EMG signals is a common processing step used when performing electroencephalographic-electromyographic (EEG-EMG) coherence and EMG-EMG coherence. It is well known, however, that EMG rectification alters the power spectrum of the recorded EMG signal (interference EMG). The purpose of this study was to determine whether rectification of the EMG signal influences the capability of capturing the oscillatory input to a single EMG signal and the common oscillations between two EMG signals. Several EMG signals were reconstructed from experimentally recorded EMG signals from the surface of the first dorsal interosseus muscle and were manipulated to have an oscillatory input or common input (for pairs of reconstructed EMG signals) at various frequency bands (in Hz: 0-12, 12-30, 30-50, 50-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-250, 250-300, and 300-400), one at a time. The absolute integral and normalized integral of power, peak power, and peak coherence (for pairs of EMG signals) were quantified from each frequency band. The power spectrum of the interference EMG accurately detected the changes to the oscillatory input to the reconstructed EMG signal, whereas the power spectrum of the rectified EMG did not. Similarly, the EMG-EMG coherence between two interference EMG signals accurately detected the common input to the pairs of reconstructed EMG signals, whereas the EMG-EMG coherence between two rectified EMG signals did not. The frequency band from 12 to 30 Hz in the power spectrum of the rectified EMG and the EMG-EMG coherence between two rectified signals was influenced by the input from 100 to 150 Hz but not from the input from 12 to 30 Hz. The study concludes that the power spectrum of the EMG and EMG-EMG coherence should be performed on interference EMG signals and not on rectified EMG signals because rectification impairs the identification of the oscillatory input to a single EMG signal and the common oscillatory input between two EMG signals.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20032241      PMCID: PMC2822682          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00792.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  35 in total

1.  Human cortical muscle coherence is directly related to specific motor parameters.

Authors:  J M Kilner; S N Baker; S Salenius; R Hari; R N Lemon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Rectification and non-linear pre-processing of EMG signals for cortico-muscular analysis.

Authors:  L J Myers; M Lowery; M O'Malley; C L Vaughan; C Heneghan; A St Clair Gibson; Y X R Harley; R Sreenivasan
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 3.  EEG-EMG, MEG-EMG and EMG-EMG frequency analysis: physiological principles and clinical applications.

Authors:  P Grosse; M J Cassidy; P Brown
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Multi-directional strength and force envelope of the index finger.

Authors:  Zong-Ming Li; H Jamie Pfaeffle; Dean G Sotereanos; Robert J Goitz; Savio L-Y Woo
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Coupling of oscillatory activity between muscles is strikingly reduced in a deafferented subject compared with normal controls.

Authors:  J M Kilner; R J Fisher; R N Lemon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG.

Authors:  Dario Farina; Roberto Merletti; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-04

7.  A framework for the analysis of neuronal networks.

Authors:  A M Amjad; P Breeze; B A Conway; D M Halliday; J R Rosenberg
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.453

Review 8.  Common drive of motor units in regulation of muscle force.

Authors:  C J De Luca; Z Erim
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 13.837

9.  Patterns of EMG-EMG coherence in limb dystonia.

Authors:  Pascal Grosse; M Edwards; M A J Tijssen; A Schrag; Andrew J Lees; K P Bhatia; Peter Brown
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 10.338

10.  Coherence analysis in the myoclonus of corticobasal degeneration.

Authors:  Pascal Grosse; Andrea Kühn; Carla Cordivari; Peter Brown
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 10.338

View more
  37 in total

1.  Task failure during standing heel raises is associated with increased power from 13 to 50 Hz in the activation of triceps surae.

Authors:  Rafael Pereira; Ludmila Schettino; Marco Machado; Pierre Augusto Victor da Silva; Osmar Pinto Neto
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Cortical entrainment of human hypoglossal motor unit activities.

Authors:  Christopher M Laine; Laura A Nickerson; E Fiona Bailey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Modulation of corticomuscular coherence by peripheral stimuli.

Authors:  Verity M McClelland; Zoran Cvetkovic; Kerry R Mills
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Long-term adaptations differ for shortening and lengthening contractions.

Authors:  Osmar Pinto Neto; Hillary Lindheim; Ana Carolina de Miranda Marzullo; Harsimran S Baweja; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Muscle activity differs with load compliance during fatiguing contractions with the knee extensor muscles.

Authors:  Thorsten Rudroff; Jamie N Justice; Stephen Matthews; Rena Zuo; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Force-independent distribution of correlated neural inputs to hand muscles during three-digit grasping.

Authors:  Brach Poston; Alessander Danna-Dos Santos; Mark Jesunathadas; Thomas M Hamm; Marco Santello
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Muscle activity and time to task failure differ with load compliance and target force for elbow flexor muscles.

Authors:  Thorsten Rudroff; Jamie N Justice; Matthew R Holmes; Stephen D Matthews; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-10-28

8.  Increased voluntary drive is associated with changes in common oscillations from 13 to 60 Hz of interference but not rectified electromyography.

Authors:  Osmar P Neto; Harsimran S Baweja; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.217

9.  Cortical activity differs between position- and force-control knee extension tasks.

Authors:  Peter C Poortvliet; Kylie J Tucker; Simon Finnigan; Dion Scott; Paul Sowman; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Effect of training status on beta-range corticomuscular coherence in agonist vs. antagonist muscles during isometric knee contractions.

Authors:  Fabien Dal Maso; Marieke Longcamp; Sylvain Cremoux; David Amarantini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.