Literature DB >> 2104552

Analysis of gender differences in the auditory brainstem response.

C P Dehan1, J Jerger.   

Abstract

This study examined the effects of hormones, head size, and oral temperatures on latencies and amplitudes of the auditory brainstem response in 10 young women, 10 young men, and 5 postmenopausal women. Significant gender differences between men's and women's auditory brainstem responses were confirmed. Men showed longer latencies and smaller amplitudes than women. Results showed that oral temperature has little effect on auditory brainstem response latencies and amplitudes. Head size affects waves III, V, and the amplitude of wave V, but is not entirely responsible for the gender latency difference. By examining young women with normal monthly hormonal cycles, significant changes in the absolute latencies of wave V were observed. These changes were correlated with hormonal changes as measured from venous blood samples. It was concluded that the etiology of the gender difference is a combination of hormonal and head-size differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2104552     DOI: 10.1288/00005537-199001000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  15 in total

1.  Are there sex effects for speech intelligibility in American English? Examining the influence of talker, listener, and methodology.

Authors:  Sarah E Yoho; Stephanie A Borrie; Tyson S Barrett; Dane B Whittaker
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Gender and modulation frequency effects on auditory steady state response (ASSR) thresholds.

Authors:  Mohd Normani Zakaria; Bahram Jalaei; Nor Alaudin Abdul Wahab
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Role of sex hormones produced during menstrual cycle on brainstem encoding of speech stimulus.

Authors:  Prashanth Prabhu; Neha Banerjee; Arya Anil; Asma Abdulla
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Examining physiological and perceptual consequences of noise exposure.

Authors:  Aryn M Kamerer; Judy G Kopun; Sara E Fultz; Carissa Allen; Stephen T Neely; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Auditory function and dysfunction: estrogen makes a difference.

Authors:  Amandine Delhez; Philippe Lefebvre; Christel Péqueux; Brigitte Malgrange; Laurence Delacroix
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 6.  Estrogenic modulation of auditory processing: a vertebrate comparison.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 8.606

7.  Letter to the Editor: Examination of Potential Sex Influences in . Auditory Function in Normal-Hearing, Noise-Exposed Human Ears, Ear Hear, 36, 172-184.

Authors:  Greta C Stamper; Tiffany A Johnson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Pre- and postovulatory auditory brainstem response in normal women.

Authors:  Namrata Upadhayay; Bishnu Hari Paudel; Paras Nath Singh; Bal Krishna Bhattarai; Kopila Agrawal
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-11-30

9.  Analysis of Auditory Brainstem Response Change, according to Tinnitus Duration, in Patients with Tinnitus with Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Jae Woo Joo; Yong Jun Jeong; Mun Soo Han; Young-Soo Chang; Yoon Chan Rah; June Choi
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.017

10.  A multi-metric approach to characterizing mouse peripheral auditory nerve function using the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  Carolyn M McClaskey; Clarisse H Panganiban; Kenyaria V Noble; James W Dias; Hainan Lang; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 2.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.