Literature DB >> 21044160

Living donor evaluation and exclusion: the Stanford experience.

Jessica B Lapasia1, Soo-yee Kong, Stephan Busque, John D Scandling, Glenn M Chertow, Jane C Tan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The proportion of prospective living donors disqualified for medical reasons is unknown. The objective of this study is to delineate and quantify specific reasons for exclusion of prospective living donors from kidney donation.
METHODS: All adult prospective kidney donors who contacted our transplant program between October 1, 2007 and April 1, 2009 were included in our analysis (n = 484). Data were collected by review of an electronic transplant database.
RESULTS: Of the 484 prospective donors, 39 (8%) successfully donated, 229 (47%) were excluded, 104 (22%) were actively undergoing evaluation, and 112 (23%) were withdrawn before evaluation was complete. Criteria for exclusion were medical (n = 150), psychosocial (n = 22), or histocompatibility (n = 57) reasons. Of the 150 prospective donors excluded for medical reasons, 79% were excluded because of obesity, hypertension, nephrolithiasis, and/or abnormal glucose tolerance. One hundred and forty-seven (61%) intended recipients had only one prospective living donor, of whom 63 (42%) were excluded.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of prospective living kidney donors were excluded for medical reasons such as obesity (body mass index >30), hypertension, nephrolithiasis, and abnormal glucose tolerance. Longer-term studies are needed to characterize the risks to medically complex kidney donors and the potential risks and benefits afforded to recipients.
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21044160      PMCID: PMC3357090          DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01336.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   2.863


  21 in total

1.  Exchanging kidneys--advances in living-donor transplantation.

Authors:  Francis L Delmonico
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1999-2008: the changing face of living donation.

Authors:  D A Axelrod; K P McCullough; E D Brewer; B N Becker; D L Segev; P S Rao
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Trends and results for organ donation and transplantation in the United States, 2004.

Authors:  Friedrich K Port; Dawn M Dykstra; Robert M Merion; Robert A Wolfe
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Outcome of assessment of potential donors for live donor kidney transplants.

Authors:  F J McCurdie; M D Pascoe; C J Broomberg; D Kahn
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Analysis of donor selection procedure in 139 living-related kidney donors and follow-up results for donors and recipients.

Authors:  G M Beekman; W T van Dorp; L A van Es; J H van Bockel; J L van Saase; F J van der Woude; R M Valentijn
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 5.992

6.  Evaluation of living renal donors. The current practice of US transplant centers.

Authors:  M J Bia; E L Ramos; G M Danovitch; R S Gaston; W E Harmon; A B Leichtman; P A Lundin; J Neylan; B L Kasiske
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1995-08-27       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Influence of obesity on the appearance of proteinuria and renal insufficiency after unilateral nephrectomy.

Authors:  M Praga; E Hernández; J C Herrero; E Morales; Y Revilla; R Díaz-González; J L Rodicio
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 10.612

8.  Comparison of survival probabilities for dialysis patients vs cadaveric renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  F K Port; R A Wolfe; E A Mauger; D P Berling; K Jiang
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Impact of renal cadaveric transplantation on survival in end-stage renal failure: evidence for reduced mortality risk compared with hemodialysis during long-term follow-up.

Authors:  P Schnuelle; D Lorenz; M Trede; F J Van Der Woude
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 10.121

10.  Forty-five year follow-up after uninephrectomy.

Authors:  D M Narkun-Burgess; C R Nolan; J E Norman; W F Page; P L Miller; T W Meyer
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 10.612

View more
  17 in total

1.  Incidental kidney stones: a single center experience with kidney donor selection.

Authors:  Irene K Kim; Jane C Tan; Jessica Lapasia; Arvand Elihu; Stephan Busque; Marc L Melcher
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.863

2.  Racial differences in completion of the living kidney donor evaluation process.

Authors:  Komal Kumar; James M Tonascia; Abimereki D Muzaale; Tanjala S Purnell; Shane E Ottmann; Fawaz Al Ammary; Mary G Bowring; Anna Poon; Elizabeth A King; Allan B Massie; Eric K H Chow; Alvin G Thomas; Hao Ying; Marvin Borja; Jonathan M Konel; Macey Henderson; Andrew M Cameron; Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.863

3.  Donation approval among obese living kidney donor candidates: The impact of metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Margaux N Mustian; Vineeta Kumar; Michael Hanaway; Paul A MacLennan; Brittany A Shelton; Rhiannon D Reed; Tanya Correya; Raynesha Grant; Alexis Carter; Gavin Baker; Jelecia Patterson; Markayla Peoples; Semaj Holden; Babak J Orandi; Jayme E Locke
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 4.  Evolving swaps in transplantation: global exchange, vouchers, liver, and trans-organ paired exchange.

Authors:  Alexis L Lo; Elizabeth M Sonnenberg; Peter L Abt
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.640

5.  Multiple reasons for living donor denial: A single-center experience.

Authors:  Erik L Lum; Jenny I Shen; Jennifer L Beaumont; Eric Treat; Anjay Rastogi; Amy Waterman; Hans Albin Gritsch
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.863

6.  Patient Perspectives on Weight Management for Living Kidney Donation.

Authors:  Margaux N Mustian; Michael Hanaway; Vineeta Kumar; Rhiannon D Reed; Brittany A Shelton; Raynesha Grant; Alexis Carter; Jayme E Locke
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Characteristics and Evaluation of Geographically Distant vs Geographically Nearby Living Kidney Donors.

Authors:  F L Weng; D C Lee; N Dhillon; K N Tibaldi; L A Davis; A M Patel; R J Goldberg; M Morgievich; S Mulgaonkar
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.066

8.  Preventive intervention for living donor psychosocial outcomes: feasibility and efficacy in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M A Dew; A F DiMartini; A J DeVito Dabbs; A Zuckoff; H P Tan; M L McNulty; G E Switzer; K R Fox; J B Greenhouse; A Humar
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Helping More Patients Receive a Living Donor Kidney Transplant.

Authors:  Amit X Garg
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: Improving Efficiencies in Live Kidney Donor Evaluation--Recommendations from a Consensus Conference.

Authors:  Deonna R Moore; David Serur; Dianne LaPointe Rudow; James R Rodrigue; Rebecca Hays; Matthew Cooper
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 8.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.