Literature DB >> 15848472

Outcome of assessment of potential donors for live donor kidney transplants.

F J McCurdie1, M D Pascoe, C J Broomberg, D Kahn.   

Abstract

The critical shortage of cadaver donor organs for renal transplantation has resulted in the increased use of living donors. We reviewed the outcomes of the assessments of potential living kidney donors. One hundred seventeen potential donors evaluated over a 39-month period were included in the study. The work-up of the potential donors consisted of a step-wise progression of clinical, blood, and radiological tests. Of the 117 potential donors, only 20 were ultimately used. Five percent of the donors were found to be unsuitable because of medical problems at the initial visit. A further 25% were blood group incompatible, 13% were excluded following the investigations, 9% had psychosocial problems, and in 4% there were recipient problems. Twenty-two percent of suitable donors were not used either because another live donor was used or because a cadaver donor kidney was available. In conclusion, although the assessment of potential donors requires much time and effort, only a small minority of donors assessed are ultimately used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15848472     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  7 in total

1.  Living donor evaluation and exclusion: the Stanford experience.

Authors:  Jessica B Lapasia; Soo-yee Kong; Stephan Busque; John D Scandling; Glenn M Chertow; Jane C Tan
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 2.863

2.  Multiple reasons for living donor denial: A single-center experience.

Authors:  Erik L Lum; Jenny I Shen; Jennifer L Beaumont; Eric Treat; Anjay Rastogi; Amy Waterman; Hans Albin Gritsch
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.863

3.  Living kidney donation in a developing country.

Authors:  Chandni Dayal; Malcolm Davies; Nina Elisabeth Diana; Anthony Meyers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: Improving Efficiencies in Live Kidney Donor Evaluation--Recommendations from a Consensus Conference.

Authors:  Deonna R Moore; David Serur; Dianne LaPointe Rudow; James R Rodrigue; Rebecca Hays; Matthew Cooper
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  The Efficiency of Evaluating Candidates for Living Kidney Donation: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Steven Habbous; Justin Woo; Ngan N Lam; Krista L Lentine; Matthew Cooper; Marian Reich; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2018-09-20

6.  Outcomes of Living Kidney Donor Candidate Evaluations in the Living Donor Collective Pilot Registry.

Authors:  Bertram L Kasiske; Yoon Son Ahn; Michael Conboy; Mary Amanda Dew; Christian Folken; Macey Levan; Ajay K Israni; Krista L Lentine; Arthur J Matas; Kenneth A Newell; Dianne LaPointe Rudow; Allan B Massie; Donald Musgrove; Jon J Snyder; Sandra J Taler; Jeffrey Wang; Amy D Waterman
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-04-22

7.  Assessment of Potential Live Kidney Donors and Computed Tomographic Renal Angiograms at Christchurch Hospital.

Authors:  Thamer Alsulaiman; Stephen Mark; Sarah Armstrong; David McGregor
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2016-03-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.