BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary therapy for pancreatic cancer involves radical resection followed by gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), when elevated preoperatively, is a useful marker to monitor disease status following resection. However, little has been reported on outcomes of patients in whom CA19-9 never normalizes. We hypothesize that failure of CA19-9 normalization within 6 months is prognostically equivalent to metastatic disease. METHODS: From our pancreatectomy database, we identified 93 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and elevated CA19-9 prior to resection with levels recorded postoperatively. Patients were grouped based on normalization or persistent elevation of CA19-9 at 6 months after resection. CA19-9 levels normalized (≤35 u/ml) after resection in 38 (41%) and remained elevated in 55 (59%). Clinicopathologic characteristics were compared using Student's t-test and contingency table analyses. Survival curves were constructed using Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank analysis. Cox regression was used to determine predictors of survival. RESULTS: The two groups had comparable clinicopathologic characteristics except for nodal status and perineural invasion, which were higher in patients with persistently elevated CA19-9. Persistent CA19-9 conferred shorter median overall survival of 10.8 months compared with 23.8 months in patients with normalization (p < 0.001), which persisted when controlling for nodal status. Multivariate analysis demonstrated persistently elevated CA19-9 as the sole statistically significant negative predictor of survival [hazard ratio (HR) 2.20, p = 0.002]. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent CA19-9 elevation after pancreatectomy correlates with shorter survival analogous to unresected or metastatic disease and should be regarded as persistent disease regardless of radiographic findings. These patients should be considered for accrual to clinical trials or initiation of alternative therapy.
BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary therapy for pancreatic cancer involves radical resection followed by gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), when elevated preoperatively, is a useful marker to monitor disease status following resection. However, little has been reported on outcomes of patients in whom CA19-9 never normalizes. We hypothesize that failure of CA19-9 normalization within 6 months is prognostically equivalent to metastatic disease. METHODS: From our pancreatectomy database, we identified 93 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and elevated CA19-9 prior to resection with levels recorded postoperatively. Patients were grouped based on normalization or persistent elevation of CA19-9 at 6 months after resection. CA19-9 levels normalized (≤35 u/ml) after resection in 38 (41%) and remained elevated in 55 (59%). Clinicopathologic characteristics were compared using Student's t-test and contingency table analyses. Survival curves were constructed using Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank analysis. Cox regression was used to determine predictors of survival. RESULTS: The two groups had comparable clinicopathologic characteristics except for nodal status and perineural invasion, which were higher in patients with persistently elevated CA19-9. Persistent CA19-9 conferred shorter median overall survival of 10.8 months compared with 23.8 months in patients with normalization (p < 0.001), which persisted when controlling for nodal status. Multivariate analysis demonstrated persistently elevated CA19-9 as the sole statistically significant negative predictor of survival [hazard ratio (HR) 2.20, p = 0.002]. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent CA19-9 elevation after pancreatectomy correlates with shorter survival analogous to unresected or metastatic disease and should be regarded as persistent disease regardless of radiographic findings. These patients should be considered for accrual to clinical trials or initiation of alternative therapy.
Authors: Helmut Oettle; Stefan Post; Peter Neuhaus; Klaus Gellert; Jan Langrehr; Karsten Ridwelski; Harald Schramm; Joerg Fahlke; Carl Zuelke; Christof Burkart; Klaus Gutberlet; Erika Kettner; Harald Schmalenberg; Karin Weigang-Koehler; Wolf-Otto Bechstein; Marco Niedergethmann; Ingo Schmidt-Wolf; Lars Roll; Bernd Doerken; Hanno Riess Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-01-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Cristina R Ferrone; Dianne M Finkelstein; Sarah P Thayer; Alona Muzikansky; Carlos Fernandez-delCastillo; Andrew L Warshaw Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mark Bloomston; Tanios S Bekaii-Saab; Kavitha Kosuri; Sarah M Cowgill; W Scott Melvin; E Christopher Ellison; Peter Muscarella Journal: Pancreas Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: S L Ong; G Garcea; S C Thomasset; C D Mann; C P Neal; M Abu Amara; A R Dennison; D P Berry Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2007-11-28 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Ryan M Thomas; Mark J Truty; Michael Kim; Ya'an Kang; Ran Zhang; Deyali Chatterjee; Matthew H Katz; Jason B Fleming Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2014-11-18 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Hunter B Moore; Alessandro Paniccia; Peter J Lawson; Robert J Torphy; Trevor L Nydam; Ernest E Moore; Martin D McCarter; Richard D Schulick; Barish H Edil Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2018-03-30 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Selina K Wong; Lovedeep Gondara; Daniel J Renouf; Howard J Lim; Jonathan M Loree; Janine M Davies; Sharlene Gill Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2021-04
Authors: Aaron J Grossberg; Linda C Chu; Christopher R Deig; Eliot K Fishman; William L Hwang; Anirban Maitra; Daniel L Marks; Arnav Mehta; Nima Nabavizadeh; Diane M Simeone; Colin D Weekes; Charles R Thomas Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2020-07-19 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Sylvester N Osayi; Mark Bloomston; Carl M Schmidt; E Christopher Ellison; Peter Muscarella Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-06-24 Impact factor: 3.411