Literature DB >> 25419353

Diagnostic value of combining CA 19-9 and K-ras gene mutation in pancreatic carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Jiangning Gu1, Di Wang2, Ya Huang3, Yi Lu4, Chenghong Peng1.   

Abstract

AIMS: To assess diagnostic value of Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), combined CA 19-9 and K-ras mutation in plasma DNA in diagnosing patients with pancreatic carcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Sinomed, CNKI and other databases, from established to November, 2013, were searched for initial studies. All the studies published in English or Chinese relating to the diagnostic value of CA 19-9 and K-ras gene mutation for patients with pancreatic cancer were collected. Methodological quality was assessed. The statistic software called "Meta-disc" (version 1.4) was used for data analysis.
RESULTS: 10 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity estimate for CA 19-9 (78%) was significantly higher than K-ras mutation (65%). While, for the specificity estimate, K-ras mutation (93%) was significantly higher than CA 19-9 (77%). The pooled DOR estimate for K-ras mutation (21.82) was significantly higher than CA 19-9 (18.36). SROC curves for K-ras mutation showed better diagnostic accuracy than CA 19-9. For CA 19-9 measurement, its diagnostic value decreased in differentiating pancreatic cancer for patients with pancreatitis, especially chronic process.
CONCLUSION: CA 19-9 was a high sensitive and K-ras was a high specific method in diagnosing patients with pancreatic cancer. These two modalities probably act different roles during different conditions in diagnosing pancreatic carcinoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbohydrate antigen 19-9; K-ras mutation; diagnosis; meta-analysis; pancreatic carcinoma

Year:  2014        PMID: 25419353      PMCID: PMC4238530     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  46 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of K-ras mutations in serum of pancreatic cancer patients.

Authors:  L Theodor; E Melzer; M Sologov; S Bar-Meir
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Comparison of circulating MMP-9, TIMP-1 and CA19-9 in the detection of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Maiken Thyregod Joergensen; Nils Brünner; Ove B Schaffalitzky De Muckadell
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 3.  Advances in biomarker research for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Kruttika Bhat; Fengfei Wang; Qingyong Ma; Qinyu Li; Sanku Mallik; Tze-Chen Hsieh; Erxi Wu
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.116

Review 4.  Molecular markers of early pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Michael Goggins
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Molecular and clinical markers of pancreas cancer.

Authors:  James L Buxbaum; Mohamad A Eloubeidi
Journal:  JOP       Date:  2010-11-09

6.  BRAF and KRAS gene mutations in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm/carcinoma (IPMN/IPMC) of the pancreas.

Authors:  Frank Schönleben; Wanglong Qiu; Karl C Bruckman; Nancy T Ciau; Xiaojun Li; Margaret H Lauerman; Harold Frucht; John A Chabot; John D Allendorf; Helen E Remotti; Gloria H Su
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 8.679

7.  KRAS and GNAS mutations and p53 overexpression in biliary intraepithelial neoplasia and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.

Authors:  Maylee Hsu; Motoko Sasaki; Saya Igarashi; Yasunori Sato; Yasuni Nakanuma
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  TPS, CA 19-9, VEGF-A, and CEA as diagnostic and prognostic factors in patients with mass lesions in the pancreatic head.

Authors:  Gabriel Sandblom; Sofie Granroth; Ib Christian Rasmussen
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.384

Review 9.  [Clinical usefulness of tumor markers associated with pancreatic cancer].

Authors:  H Watanabe; H Kawakami; O Yamakawa; Y Satomura; H Ohta; Y Motoo; T Okai; N Sawabu
Journal:  Rinsho Byori       Date:  1994-02

Review 10.  Technical Advances in Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Tissue Acquisition for Pancreatic Cancers: How Can We Get the Best Results with EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration?

Authors:  Prashant Kedia; Monica Gaidhane; Michel Kahaleh
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2013-09-30
View more
  7 in total

1.  Detection of K-ras gene mutations in feces by magnetic nanoprobe in patients with pancreatic cancer: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Xiaoguang Wang; Jingshuai Wang; Fei Chen; Zhengxiang Zhong; Lifeng Qi
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 2.  Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: New Insights into the Actions of Vitamin A.

Authors:  Eduardo Mere Del Aguila; Xiao-Han Tang; Lorraine J Gudas
Journal:  Oncol Res Treat       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 3.  Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of five common tumour biomarkers and CA19-9 for pancreatic cancer: a protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.

Authors:  Long Ge; Bei Pan; Fujian Song; Jichun Ma; Dena Zeraatkar; Jianguo Zhou; Jinhui Tian
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Integrated epigenetic biomarkers in circulating cell-free DNA as a robust classifier for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Feng Cao; Ailin Wei; Xinlei Hu; Yijing He; Jun Zhang; Lin Xia; Kailing Tu; Jue Yuan; Ziheng Guo; Hongying Liu; Dan Xie; Ang Li
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 6.551

5.  Oral microbiome and pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Ai-Lin Wei; Mao Li; Guo-Qing Li; Xuan Wang; Wei-Ming Hu; Zhen-Lu Li; Jue Yuan; Hong-Ying Liu; Li-Li Zhou; Ka Li; Ang Li; Mei Rosemary Fu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Pancreatic Cancer: A Review of Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Authors:  ZhiYu Zhao; Wei Liu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

7.  Prognostic significance of K-ras mutations in pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lian-yuan Tao; Ling-fu Zhang; Dian-rong Xiu; Chun-hui Yuan; Zhao-lai Ma; Bin Jiang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 2.754

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.