BACKGROUND: Recurrence after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is common, thus postoperative surveillance is critical for detection and treatment of recurrent disease. The development of biologically based techniques for early recurrence detection may enable more timely and effective treatment of such recurrences. METHODS: Tumor fragments derived from patients who underwent potentially curative resection of PDAC were heterotopically implanted into NOD/SCID mice. Engraftment success rates and growth parameters were matched to clinicopathologic data, preoperative treatment status, and oncologic outcomes to correlate disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival. RESULTS: Seventy patients consented to participate with 56 (80 %) developing a mouse PDAC tumorgraft. Patients with successful engraftment had a shorter median DFS compared with patients whose tumorgrafts failed to engraft (9.8 vs. 40.9 mo, respectively; p < 0.01). Fifty patients received preoperative therapy with 36 (72 %) successful tumorgrafts from this cohort. On multivariate analysis, lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio [HR] 3, 95 % CI 1.4-6.7, p < 0.01) and successful engraftment (HR 5.8, 95 % CI 2-16.9, p < 0.01) were predictive of a shorter DFS in the preoperative therapy cohort. In patients who recurred, tumorgraft formation was identified at a median of 134.5 days before standard methods of radiographic recurrence detection (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-derived tumorgrafts from resected PDAC may potentially predict recurrence months before currently available surveillance modalities. This lead-time advantage may allow for earlier implementation or changes in therapy as successful engraftment, particularly in those having undergone preoperative therapy, may indicate a more biologically aggressive disease.
BACKGROUND: Recurrence after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is common, thus postoperative surveillance is critical for detection and treatment of recurrent disease. The development of biologically based techniques for early recurrence detection may enable more timely and effective treatment of such recurrences. METHODS:Tumor fragments derived from patients who underwent potentially curative resection of PDAC were heterotopically implanted into NOD/SCIDmice. Engraftment success rates and growth parameters were matched to clinicopathologic data, preoperative treatment status, and oncologic outcomes to correlate disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival. RESULTS: Seventy patients consented to participate with 56 (80 %) developing a mousePDAC tumorgraft. Patients with successful engraftment had a shorter median DFS compared with patients whose tumorgrafts failed to engraft (9.8 vs. 40.9 mo, respectively; p < 0.01). Fifty patients received preoperative therapy with 36 (72 %) successful tumorgrafts from this cohort. On multivariate analysis, lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio [HR] 3, 95 % CI 1.4-6.7, p < 0.01) and successful engraftment (HR 5.8, 95 % CI 2-16.9, p < 0.01) were predictive of a shorter DFS in the preoperative therapy cohort. In patients who recurred, tumorgraft formation was identified at a median of 134.5 days before standard methods of radiographic recurrence detection (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Patient-derived tumorgrafts from resected PDAC may potentially predict recurrence months before currently available surveillance modalities. This lead-time advantage may allow for earlier implementation or changes in therapy as successful engraftment, particularly in those having undergone preoperative therapy, may indicate a more biologically aggressive disease.
Authors: Michael P Kim; Douglas B Evans; Huamin Wang; James L Abbruzzese; Jason B Fleming; Gary E Gallick Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2009-10-29 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: R E Wilentz; G H Su; J L Dai; A B Sparks; P Argani; T A Sohn; C J Yeo; S E Kern; R H Hruban Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Georg Feldmann; Anjali Mishra; Savita Bisht; Collins Karikari; Ignacio Garrido-Laguna; Zeshaan Rasheed; Niki A Ottenhof; Tikva Dadon; Hector Alvarez; Volker Fendrich; N V Rajeshkumar; William Matsui; Peter Brossart; Manuel Hidalgo; Rajat Bannerji; Anirban Maitra; Barry D Nelkin Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2011-10-01 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Ignacio Garrido-Laguna; Maria Uson; N V Rajeshkumar; Aik Choon Tan; Elizabeth de Oliveira; Collins Karikari; Maria C Villaroel; Ana Salomon; Gretchen Taylor; Rajni Sharma; Ralph H Hruban; Anirban Maitra; Daniel Laheru; Belén Rubio-Viqueira; Antonio Jimeno; Manuel Hidalgo Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-07-08 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: T M Breslin; K R Hess; D B Harbison; M E Jean; K R Cleary; A P Dackiw; R A Wolff; J L Abbruzzese; N A Janjan; C H Crane; J N Vauthey; J E Lee; P W Pisters; D B Evans Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Masamichi Mizuma; Zeshaan A Rasheed; Shinichi Yabuuchi; Noriyuki Omura; Nathaniel R Campbell; Roeland F de Wilde; Elizabeth De Oliveira; Qing Zhang; Oscar Puig; William Matsui; Manuel Hidalgo; Anirban Maitra; N V Rajeshkumar Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2012-07-02 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: David Roife; Ya'an Kang; Li Wang; Bingliang Fang; Stephen G Swisher; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Shanna Pretzsch; Colin P Dinney; Matthew H G Katz; Jason B Fleming Journal: Surgery Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Kien Pham; Daniel Delitto; Andrea E Knowlton; Emily R Hartlage; Ricky Madhavan; David H Gonzalo; Ryan M Thomas; Kevin E Behrns; Thomas J George; Steven J Hughes; Shannon M Wallet; Chen Liu; Jose G Trevino Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Tommy Ivanics; John R Bergquist; Gang Liu; Michael P Kim; Yaan Kang; Matthew H Katz; Mayrim V Rios Perez; Ryan M Thomas; Jason B Fleming; Mark J Truty Journal: Lab Invest Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 5.662
Authors: James D Byrne; Mohammad R N Jajja; Allison N Schorzman; Amanda W Keeler; J Christopher Luft; William C Zamboni; Joseph M DeSimone; Jen Jen Yeh Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kristina L Go; Daniel Delitto; Sarah M Judge; Michael H Gerber; Thomas J George; Kevin E Behrns; Steven J Hughes; Andrew R Judge; Jose G Trevino Journal: Pancreas Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Eugene J Koay; Yeonju Lee; Vittorio Cristini; John S Lowengrub; Ya'an Kang; F Anthony San Lucas; Brian P Hobbs; Rong Ye; Dalia Elganainy; Muayad Almahariq; Ahmed M Amer; Deyali Chatterjee; Huaming Yan; Peter C Park; Mayrim V Rios Perez; Dali Li; Naveen Garg; Kim A Reiss; Shun Yu; Anil Chauhan; Mohamed Zaid; Newsha Nikzad; Robert A Wolff; Milind Javle; Gauri R Varadhachary; Rachna T Shroff; Prajnan Das; Jeffrey E Lee; Mauro Ferrari; Anirban Maitra; Cullen M Taniguchi; Michael P Kim; Christopher H Crane; Matthew H Katz; Huamin Wang; Priya Bhosale; Eric P Tamm; Jason B Fleming Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-08-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Robert J Allaway; Dawn A Fischer; Francine B de Abreu; Timothy B Gardner; Stuart R Gordon; Richard J Barth; Thomas A Colacchio; Matthew Wood; Balint Z Kacsoh; Stephanie J Bouley; Jingxuan Cui; Joanna Hamilton; Jungbin A Choi; Joshua T Lange; Jason D Peterson; Vijayalakshmi Padmanabhan; Craig R Tomlinson; Gregory J Tsongalis; Arief A Suriawinata; Casey S Greene; Yolanda Sanchez; Kerrington D Smith Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-03-29
Authors: Ilaria Pergolini; Vicente Morales-Oyarvide; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Kim C Honselmann; Matthew W Rosenbaum; Sabikun Nahar; Marina Kem; Cristina R Ferrone; Keith D Lillemoe; Nabeel Bardeesy; David P Ryan; Sarah P Thayer; Andrew L Warshaw; Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo; Andrew S Liss Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-08-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Susan Tsai; Laura McOlash; Katie Palen; Bryon Johnson; Christine Duris; Qiuhui Yang; Michael B Dwinell; Bryan Hunt; Douglas B Evans; Jill Gershan; Michael A James Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 4.430