Bernard T Lee1, Merlijn Hutteman, Sylvain Gioux, Alan Stockdale, Samuel J Lin, Long H Ngo, John V Frangioni. 1. Boston, Mass.; and Leiden, The Netherlands From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, the Divisions of General Medicine and Primary Care and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, and the Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, and the Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The ability to determine flap perfusion in reconstructive surgery is still primarily based on clinical examination. In this study, the authors demonstrate the use of an intraoperative, near-infrared fluorescence imaging system for evaluation of perforator location and flap perfusion. METHODS: Indocyanine green was injected intravenously in six breast cancer patients undergoing a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Three dose levels of indocyanine green were assessed using the fluorescence-assisted resection and exploration (FLARE) imaging system. This system uses light-emitting diodes for fluorescence excitation, which is different from current commercially available systems. In this pilot study, the operating surgeons were blinded to the imaging results. RESULTS: Use of the FLARE system was successful in all six study subjects, with no complications or sequelae. Among the three dose levels, 4 mg per injection resulted in the highest observed contrast-to-background ratio, signal-to-background ratio, and signal-to-noise ratio. However, because of small sample size, the authors did not have sufficient power to detect statistical significance for these pairwise comparisons at the multiple-comparison adjusted type I error of 0.017. Six milligrams per injection provided a similar contrast-to-background ratio but also a higher residual background signal. CONCLUSION: Based on this pilot study, the authors conclude that near-infrared assessment of perforator flap breast reconstruction is feasible with a light-emitting diode-based system, and that a dose of 4 mg of indocyanine green per injection yields the best observed contrast-to-background ratio compared with a dose of 2 or 6 mg for assessment of flap perfusion.
BACKGROUND: The ability to determine flap perfusion in reconstructive surgery is still primarily based on clinical examination. In this study, the authors demonstrate the use of an intraoperative, near-infrared fluorescence imaging system for evaluation of perforator location and flap perfusion. METHODS:Indocyanine green was injected intravenously in six breast cancerpatients undergoing a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Three dose levels of indocyanine green were assessed using the fluorescence-assisted resection and exploration (FLARE) imaging system. This system uses light-emitting diodes for fluorescence excitation, which is different from current commercially available systems. In this pilot study, the operating surgeons were blinded to the imaging results. RESULTS: Use of the FLARE system was successful in all six study subjects, with no complications or sequelae. Among the three dose levels, 4 mg per injection resulted in the highest observed contrast-to-background ratio, signal-to-background ratio, and signal-to-noise ratio. However, because of small sample size, the authors did not have sufficient power to detect statistical significance for these pairwise comparisons at the multiple-comparison adjusted type I error of 0.017. Six milligrams per injection provided a similar contrast-to-background ratio but also a higher residual background signal. CONCLUSION: Based on this pilot study, the authors conclude that near-infrared assessment of perforator flap breast reconstruction is feasible with a light-emitting diode-based system, and that a dose of 4 mg of indocyanine green per injection yields the best observed contrast-to-background ratio compared with a dose of 2 or 6 mg for assessment of flap perfusion.
Authors: John T Nguyen; Yoshitomo Ashitate; Ian A Buchanan; Ahmed M S Ibrahim; Sylvain Gioux; Priti P Patel; John V Frangioni; Bernard T Lee Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Boudewijn E Schaafsma; J Sven D Mieog; Merlijn Hutteman; Joost R van der Vorst; Peter J K Kuppen; Clemens W G M Löwik; John V Frangioni; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Alexander L Vahrmeijer Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Yang Liu; Raphael Njuguna; Thomas Matthews; Walter J Akers; Gail P Sudlow; Suman Mondal; Rui Tang; Viktor Gruev; Samuel Achilefu Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Merlijn Hutteman; Joost R van der Vorst; Cornelis J H van de Velde; John V Frangioni Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2013-07-23 Impact factor: 66.675