Literature DB >> 11720831

Lack of efficacy of twice-weekly urokinase in the prevention of complications associated with Hickman catheters: a multicentre randomised comparison of urokinase versus heparin.

B Solomon1, J Moore, C Arthur, H M Prince.   

Abstract

Hickman catheters (HC) are associated with complications, in particular infection, occlusion and thrombosis. We tested the hypothesis that regular flushing of catheters with urokinase would reduce the frequency of these complications. Patients who required a double-lumen HC for (1) bone marrow or peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation or (2) intensive combination chemotherapy for haematological malignancies were randomised to receive twice-weekly flushes of either urokinase (5000 units) or heparin (50 units). HC-survival analysis was determined by Cox regression. 100 patients were enrolled (urokinase=52; heparin=48) and treated for a mean of 8.5 weeks. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of HC-associated septicaemic events, which occurred in 8/52 in the urokinase group and 9/48 in the heparin group (actuarial incidence 20% versus 25%, P=0.50). Similarly, there was no differences in the incidence of exit site infections (urokinase=27/52 and heparin=28/48, P=0.122); HC-septic thromboses (urokinase=2/52 and heparin=4/48, P=0.34); lumen occlusion (urokinase=30/52 and heparin=30/48, P=0.681); or venous thrombosis (urokinase=8/52 and heparin=6/48, P=0.726). Overall, a high incidence of HC-related complications was seen in both groups; 40/52 in the urokinase group and 40/48 in the heparin group (actuarial incidence 80% versus 90%, P=0.367). Despite this only 18% of HC required early removal due to complications (urokinase=8, heparin=10). There was no difference in the incidence of complications in patients undergoing transplantation (n=68) compared with chemotherapy alone (n=32). Patients with haematological malignancies were more likely to have HC-related infective complications (P=0.006), and patients with solid tumours more likely to have venous thrombosis (P=0.027). The cumulative incidence of HC-related complications in this prospective study was higher than in previously reported series. Urokinase did not appear effective in reducing the frequency of these complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11720831     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00320-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  9 in total

1.  Risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in cancer patients: a patient-level data (IPD) meta-analysis of clinical trials and prospective studies.

Authors:  W Saber; T Moua; E C Williams; M Verso; G Agnelli; S Couban; A Young; M De Cicco; R Biffi; C J van Rooden; M V Huisman; D Fagnani; C Cimminiello; M Moia; M Magagnoli; S P Povoski; S F Malak; A Y Lee
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 2.  Thrombolytic therapy for central venous catheter occlusion.

Authors:  Jacquelyn L Baskin; Ulrike Reiss; Judith A Wilimas; Monika L Metzger; Raul C Ribeiro; Ching-Hon Pui; Scott C Howard
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 3.  Heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride locking for prevention of occlusion in central venous catheters in adults.

Authors:  Eduardo López-Briz; Vicente Ruiz Garcia; Juan B Cabello; Sylvia Bort-Martí; Rafael Carbonell Sanchis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-18

4.  Infective and thrombotic complications of central venous catheters in patients with hematological malignancy: prospective evaluation of nontunneled devices.

Authors:  Leon J Worth; John F Seymour; Monica A Slavin
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Prophylaxis of port system-associated thromboses in advanced oncology patients using heparin flushing.

Authors:  C Lersch; W Kotowa; S Fung; D Janssen
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 6.  Safety and efficacy of primary thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients.

Authors:  I García Escobar; M Antonio Rebollo; S García Adrián; A Rodríguez-Garzotto; A Muñoz Martín
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 7.  Anticoagulation for people with cancer and central venous catheters.

Authors:  Lara A Kahale; Ibrahim G Tsolakian; Maram B Hakoum; Charbel F Matar; Maddalena Barba; Victor Ed Yosuico; Irene Terrenato; Francesca Sperati; Holger Schünemann; Elie A Akl
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-06-01

Review 8.  Flushing and Locking of Venous Catheters: Available Evidence and Evidence Deficit.

Authors:  Godelieve Alice Goossens
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2015-05-14

Review 9.  Heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride locking for prevention of occlusion in central venous catheters in adults.

Authors:  Eduardo López-Briz; Vicente Ruiz Garcia; Juan B Cabello; Sylvia Bort-Martí; Rafael Carbonell Sanchis; Amanda Burls
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-07-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.