Literature DB >> 21037429

A multicenter study of survival after neoadjuvant radiotherapy/chemotherapy and esophagectomy for ypT0N0M0R0 esophageal cancer.

D Vallböhmer1, Arnulf H Hölscher, S DeMeester, T DeMeester, J Salo, J Peters, T Lerut, S G Swisher, W Schröder, E Bollschweiler, W Hofstetter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate 5-year survival of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC) who have undergone multimodality treatment with complete histopathologic response.
BACKGROUND: Patients with LAEC may obtain excellent local-regional response to multimodality therapy. The overall benefit of a complete histopathologic response, when no viable tumor is present in the surgical specimen, is incompletely understood and existing data are limited to single-center studies with relatively few patients. The aim of this multicenter study was to define the outcome of patients with complete histopathologic response after multimodality therapy for LAEC.
METHODS: The study population included 299 patients (229 male, 70 female; median age: 60 years) with LAEC (cT2N1M0, T3-4N0-1M0; 181 adenocarcinomas, 118 squamous carcinomas) who underwent either neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (n = 284) or chemotherapy (n = 15) followed by esophagectomy at 6 specialized centers: Europe (3) and United States (3). All patients in the study had stage ypT0N0M0R0 after resection.
RESULTS: Esophagectomy with thoracotomy (n = 255) was more frequent than with a transhiatal approach (n = 44). The median number of analyzed lymph nodes in the surgical specimens was 20 (minimum-maximum: 1-77). Thirty-day mortality rate was 2.4% and 90-day mortality rate was 5.7%. Overall 5-year survival rate was 55%. The disease-specific 5-year survival rate was 68%, with a recurrence rate of 23.4% (n = 70; local vs distant recurrence: 3.3% vs 20.1%). Cox regression analysis identified age as the only independent predictor of survival, whereas gender, histology, type of esophagectomy, type of neoadjuvant therapy, and the number of resected lymph nodes had no prognostic impact.
CONCLUSION: Patients with histopathologic complete response at the time of resection of LAEC achieve excellent survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21037429     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181fb8dde

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  40 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

Authors:  Christian A Gutschow; Arnulf H Hölscher; Jessica Leers; Hans Fuchs; Marc Bludau; Klaus L Prenzel; E Bollschweiler; Wolfgang Schröder
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  [Squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus].

Authors:  K Ott; L Sisic; M Büchler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Patients with Non-response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Esophageal Cancer Have No Survival Advantage over Patients Undergoing Primary Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Guillaume S Chevrollier; Danica N Giugliano; Francesco Palazzo; Scott W Keith; Ernest L Rosato; Nathaniel R Evans Iii; Adam C Berger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Neoadjuvant treatment for advanced esophageal cancer: response assessment before surgery and how to predict response to chemoradiation before starting treatment.

Authors:  Elfriede Bollschweiler; Arnulf H Hölscher; Matthias Schmidt; Ute Warnecke-Eberz
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 5.  [Modern diagnostics and stage-oriented surgery: therapy of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction].

Authors:  A H Hölscher; U K Fetzner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  A propensity-matched analysis comparing survival after primary minimally invasive esophagectomy followed by adjuvant therapy to neoadjuvant therapy for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Haris Zahoor; James D Luketich; Ryan M Levy; Omar Awais; Daniel G Winger; Michael K Gibson; Katie S Nason
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Comparative Quantitative Lymph Node Assessment in Localized Esophageal Cancer Patients After R0 Resection With and Without Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy.

Authors:  Danica N Giugliano; Adam C Berger; Michael J Pucci; Ernest L Rosato; Nathaniel R Evans; Hanna Meidl; Casey Lamb; Daniel Levine; Francesco Palazzo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  A systematic review of the predictive value of (18)FDG-PET in esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation on the survival outcome stratification.

Authors:  Pascaline Schollaert; Ralph Crott; Claude Bertrand; Lionel D'Hondt; Thierry Vander Borght; Bruno Krug
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Current status of predictive biomarkers for neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Norihisa Uemura; Tadashi Kondo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2014-08-15

Review 10.  Neoadjuvant therapy for advanced esophageal cancer: the impact on surgical management.

Authors:  Masahiko Ikebe; Masaru Morita; Manabu Yamamoto; Yasushi Toh
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.