BACKGROUND: This study examined whether thirdhand smoke (THS) persists in smokers' homes after they move out and non-smokers move in, and whether new non-smoking residents are exposed to THS in these homes. METHODS: The homes of 100 smokers and 50 non-smokers were visited before the residents moved out. Dust, surfaces, air and participants' fingers were measured for nicotine and children's urine samples were analysed for cotinine. The new residents who moved into these homes were recruited if they were non-smokers. Dust, surfaces, air and new residents' fingers were examined for nicotine in 25 former smoker and 16 former non-smoker homes. A urine sample was collected from the youngest resident. RESULTS: Smoker homes' dust, surface and air nicotine levels decreased after the change of occupancy (p<0.001); however dust and surfaces showed higher contamination levels in former smoker homes than former non-smoker homes (p<0.05). Non-smoking participants' finger nicotine was higher in former smoker homes compared to former non-smoker homes (p<0.05). Finger nicotine levels among non-smokers living in former smoker homes were significantly correlated with dust and surface nicotine and urine cotinine. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that THS accumulates in smokers' homes and persists when smokers move out even after homes remain vacant for 2 months and are cleaned and prepared for new residents. When non-smokers move into homes formerly occupied by smokers, they encounter indoor environments with THS polluted surfaces and dust. Results suggest that non-smokers living in former smoker homes are exposed to THS in dust and on surfaces.
BACKGROUND: This study examined whether thirdhand smoke (THS) persists in smokers' homes after they move out and non-smokers move in, and whether new non-smoking residents are exposed to THS in these homes. METHODS: The homes of 100 smokers and 50 non-smokers were visited before the residents moved out. Dust, surfaces, air and participants' fingers were measured for nicotine and children's urine samples were analysed for cotinine. The new residents who moved into these homes were recruited if they were non-smokers. Dust, surfaces, air and new residents' fingers were examined for nicotine in 25 former smoker and 16 former non-smoker homes. A urine sample was collected from the youngest resident. RESULTS: Smoker homes' dust, surface and air nicotine levels decreased after the change of occupancy (p<0.001); however dust and surfaces showed higher contamination levels in former smoker homes than former non-smoker homes (p<0.05). Non-smoking participants' finger nicotine was higher in former smoker homes compared to former non-smoker homes (p<0.05). Finger nicotine levels among non-smokers living in former smoker homes were significantly correlated with dust and surface nicotine and urine cotinine. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that THS accumulates in smokers' homes and persists when smokers move out even after homes remain vacant for 2 months and are cleaned and prepared for new residents. When non-smokers move into homes formerly occupied by smokers, they encounter indoor environments with THS polluted surfaces and dust. Results suggest that non-smokers living in former smoker homes are exposed to THS in dust and on surfaces.
Authors: Georg E Matt; Penelope J E Quintana; Melbourne F Hovell; Dale Chatfield; Debbie S Ma; Romina Romero; Anna Uribe Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Mohamad Sleiman; Lara A Gundel; James F Pankow; Peyton Jacob; Brett C Singer; Hugo Destaillats Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-02-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sandy Liles; Melbourne F Hovell; Georg E Matt; Joy M Zakarian; Jennifer A Jones Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2009-10-29 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: B P Lanphear; T D Matte; J Rogers; R P Clickner; B Dietz; R L Bornschein; P Succop; K R Mahaffey; S Dixon; W Galke; M Rabinowitz; M Farfel; C Rohde; J Schwartz; P Ashley; D E Jacobs Journal: Environ Res Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: J A Emerson; M F Hovell; S B Meltzer; J M Zakarian; C R Hofstetter; D R Wahlgren; B P Leaderer; E O Meltzer Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1995-10 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: G E Matt; P J E Quintana; M F Hovell; J T Bernert; S Song; N Novianti; T Juarez; J Floro; C Gehrman; M Garcia; S Larson Journal: Tob Control Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Georg E Matt; Romina Romero; Debbie S Ma; Penelope Je Quintana; Melbourne F Hovell; Michael Donohue; Karen Messer; Simon Salem; Mauricio Aguilar; Justin Boland; Jennifer Cullimore; Marissa Crane; Jonathan Junker; Peter Tassinario; Vera Timmermann; Kristen Wong; Dale Chatfield Journal: Tob Induc Dis Date: 2008-07-31 Impact factor: 2.600
Authors: Lisa M Gatzke-Kopp; Michael T Willoughby; Siri M Warkentien; Thomas O'Connor; Douglas A Granger; Clancy Blair Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-11-19 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Thomas F Northrup; Georg E Matt; Melbourne F Hovell; Amir M Khan; Angela L Stotts Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-08-26 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Shannon M Farley; Elizabeth Needham Waddell; Micaela H Coady; Victoria Grimshaw; Danielle A Wright; Jenna Mandel-Ricci; Susan M Kansagra Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Peyton Jacob; Neal L Benowitz; Hugo Destaillats; Lara Gundel; Bo Hang; Manuela Martins-Green; Georg E Matt; Penelope J E Quintana; Jonathan M Samet; Suzaynn F Schick; Prue Talbot; Noel J Aquilina; Melbourne F Hovell; Jian-Hua Mao; Todd P Whitehead Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2016-12-21 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Thomas F Northrup; Angela L Stotts; Robert Suchting; Amir M Khan; Charles Green; Michelle R Klawans; Penelope J E Quintana; Eunha Hoh; Melbourne F Hovell; Georg E Matt Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 4.244