INTRODUCTION: Smoke-free policies are being increasingly promoted and adopted in subsidised multiunit housing to address disparities in residential secondhand smoke exposure. In order to inform the planning and evaluation of these policies, this study examined associations between self-reported in-home smoking and surface nicotine concentrations. METHODS: A face-to-face, cross-sectional survey was conducted from August to October 2011 with leaseholders in a probability sample of private subsidised housing units in Columbus, Ohio, without an existing smoke-free housing policy (n=301, 64% response rate). After the survey, a wipe sample was collected from a wood surface in the living room to measure surface nicotine concentrations (n=279). RESULTS: In-home smoking was reported by 56.6% of respondents. Geometric mean surface nicotine concentrations differed between non-smoking and smoking homes (11.4 vs 90.9 μg/m(2); p<0.001), and between homes with complete, partial and no voluntary home smoking restrictions (8.9 vs 56.3 vs 145.6 μg/m(2); p<0.001). Surface nicotine concentrations were moderately correlated (r=.52) with the total number of cigarettes smoked indoors per week. Smoking behaviours of respondents, other household members and visitors, and length of stay were independently associated with surface nicotine concentrations in a multivariable model, explaining 52% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: Surface nicotine concentrations were significantly associated with a range of self-reported in-home smoking behaviours. This measure should be considered for evaluating changes in in-home smoking behaviours after implementation of smoke-free policies by subsidised housing providers. More research is needed about how surface nicotine concentrations differ over space, time and various indoor surfaces.
INTRODUCTION: Smoke-free policies are being increasingly promoted and adopted in subsidised multiunit housing to address disparities in residential secondhand smoke exposure. In order to inform the planning and evaluation of these policies, this study examined associations between self-reported in-home smoking and surface nicotine concentrations. METHODS: A face-to-face, cross-sectional survey was conducted from August to October 2011 with leaseholders in a probability sample of private subsidised housing units in Columbus, Ohio, without an existing smoke-free housing policy (n=301, 64% response rate). After the survey, a wipe sample was collected from a wood surface in the living room to measure surface nicotine concentrations (n=279). RESULTS: In-home smoking was reported by 56.6% of respondents. Geometric mean surface nicotine concentrations differed between non-smoking and smoking homes (11.4 vs 90.9 μg/m(2); p<0.001), and between homes with complete, partial and no voluntary home smoking restrictions (8.9 vs 56.3 vs 145.6 μg/m(2); p<0.001). Surface nicotine concentrations were moderately correlated (r=.52) with the total number of cigarettes smoked indoors per week. Smoking behaviours of respondents, other household members and visitors, and length of stay were independently associated with surface nicotine concentrations in a multivariable model, explaining 52% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: Surface nicotine concentrations were significantly associated with a range of self-reported in-home smoking behaviours. This measure should be considered for evaluating changes in in-home smoking behaviours after implementation of smoke-free policies by subsidised housing providers. More research is needed about how surface nicotine concentrations differ over space, time and various indoor surfaces.
Entities:
Keywords:
Nicotine; Priority/special populations; Public policy; Secondhand smoke
Authors: Barbara A Pizacani; Julie E Maher; Kristen Rohde; Linda Drach; Michael J Stark Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Brian A King; K Michael Cummings; Martin C Mahoney; Harlan R Juster; Andrew J Hyland Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: B Brunekreef; B P Leaderer; R van Strien; M Oldenwening; H A Smit; L Koopman; M Kerkhof Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Melbourne F Hovell; Joy M Zakarian; Georg E Matt; Sandy Liles; Jennifer A Jones; C Richard Hofstetter; Sarah N Larson; Neal L Benowitz Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2009-10-29 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: G E Matt; P J E Quintana; M F Hovell; J T Bernert; S Song; N Novianti; T Juarez; J Floro; C Gehrman; M Garcia; S Larson Journal: Tob Control Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Georg E Matt; Penelope J E Quintana; Hugo Destaillats; Lara A Gundel; Mohamad Sleiman; Brett C Singer; Peyton Jacob; Neal Benowitz; Jonathan P Winickoff; Virender Rehan; Prue Talbot; Suzaynn Schick; Jonathan Samet; Yinsheng Wang; Bo Hang; Manuela Martins-Green; James F Pankow; Melbourne F Hovell Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2011-05-31 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Shannon M Farley; Elizabeth Needham Waddell; Micaela H Coady; Victoria Grimshaw; Danielle A Wright; Jenna Mandel-Ricci; Susan M Kansagra Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Peyton Jacob; Neal L Benowitz; Hugo Destaillats; Lara Gundel; Bo Hang; Manuela Martins-Green; Georg E Matt; Penelope J E Quintana; Jonathan M Samet; Suzaynn F Schick; Prue Talbot; Noel J Aquilina; Melbourne F Hovell; Jian-Hua Mao; Todd P Whitehead Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2016-12-21 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Vaughan W Rees; Robyn R Keske; Kevin Blaine; David Aronstein; Ediss Gandelman; Vilma Lora; Clara Savage; Alan C Geller Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Georg E Matt; Penelope J E Quintana; Eunha Hoh; Joy M Zakarian; Nathan G Dodder; Rachael A Record; Melbourne F Hovell; E Melinda Mahabee-Gittens; Samuel Padilla; Laura Markman; Kayo Watanabe; Thomas E Novotny Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2020-04-02
Authors: Georg E Matt; Penelope J E Quintana; Eunha Hoh; Joy M Zakarian; Nathan G Dodder; Rachael A Record; Melbourne F Hovell; E Melinda Mahabee-Gittens; Samuel Padilla; Laura Markman; Kayo Watanabe; Thomas E Novotny Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 4.244