Literature DB >> 10771280

The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: does the response set matter?

A Caramazza1, A Costa.   

Abstract

In three picture-word interference experiments we explore some properties of the semantic interference (SI) effect in the picture-word interference paradigm. In Experiments 1 and 2, we test whether SI may be obtained when the distractor words are not part of the response set and when only one picture per semantic category is included in the experiment. In Experiment 3, we explore if the magnitude of the SI effect depends on whether or not the distractor words are part of the response set. Reliable SI effects were obtained in all three experiments and the magnitude of the effect did not vary as a function of whether or not distractor words are part of the response set. These results are problematic for the selection mechanism in the WEAVER++ lexical access model (Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 22, 1-75; Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107-142).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10771280     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00082-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  14 in total

1.  The semantic interference effect in the picture-word paradigm: an event-related fMRI study employing overt responses.

Authors:  G I de Zubicaray; S J Wilson; K L McMahon; S Muthiah
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Now you see it ... and now again: semantic interference reflects lexical competition in speech production with and without articulation.

Authors:  Rasha Abdel Rahman; Sabrina Aristei
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

3.  Semantic competition between hierarchically related words during speech planning.

Authors:  Ansgar Hantsch; Jörg D Jescheniak; Herbert Schriefers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-09

4.  When you name the pizza you look at the coin and the bread: eye movements reveal semantic activation during word production.

Authors:  Falk Huettig; Robert J Hartsuiker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-03

5.  The cumulative semantic cost does not reflect lexical selection by competition.

Authors:  Eduardo Navarrete; Bradford Z Mahon; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-03-26

6.  A funny thing happened on the way to articulation: N400 attenuation despite behavioral interference in picture naming.

Authors:  Trevor Blackford; Phillip J Holcomb; Jonathan Grainger; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-01-14

7.  On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm.

Authors:  Albert Costa; F Xavier Alario; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

8.  Resolving semantic interference during word production requires central attention.

Authors:  Daniel Kleinman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Lexical Retrieval is not by Competition: Evidence from the Blocked Naming Paradigm.

Authors:  Eduardo Navarrete; Paul Del Prato; Francesca Peressotti; Bradford Z Mahon
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  Distractor strength and selective attention in picture-naming performance.

Authors:  Vitória Piai; Ardi Roelofs; Herbert Schriefers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.