PURPOSES: The aims of the study were to compare results of clinical/radiographic studies before second-look procedures (SLP) with SLP specimens from patients with gross residual sarcoma at diagnosis and to relate tumor viability to outcome. PATIENTS: Seventy-three patients underwent SLP before completing chemotherapy, with (n = 59) or without (n = 14) radiotherapy. Tumor sites were bladder/prostate (n = 27), head/orbit/parameningeal (n = 22), extremity/trunk (n = 14), and retroperitoneum/pelvis (n = 10). RESULTS:Of 14 patients, 1 (7%) with clinical/radiographic complete response (CR) had viable tumor. Of 59 patients, 35 (59%) without CR had viable tumor. Five-year failure-free survival (FFS) rates were 81% in 37 patients without viable tumor and 53% in 36 patients with viable tumor (Cox proportional hazards adjusted P = .05). Five-year FFS rates were 67% in 15 patients with clear margins and 43% in 21 patients with tumor-involved margins (n = 18) or viable gross tumor (n = 3) (Cox proportional hazards adjusted P = .04). Five-year survival was 78% to 79% among 73 patients with and 333 patients without SLP during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Second-look procedures can show whether viable tumor is present and may be beneficial in selected patients with rhabdomyosarcoma. Disappearance of tumor (CR) usually correlated with no viable tumor at SLP. However, 41% of patients without CR had no viable tumor. Those without viable tumor had increased FFS but not survival compared to those with viable tumor.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSES: The aims of the study were to compare results of clinical/radiographic studies before second-look procedures (SLP) with SLP specimens from patients with gross residual sarcoma at diagnosis and to relate tumor viability to outcome. PATIENTS: Seventy-three patients underwent SLP before completing chemotherapy, with (n = 59) or without (n = 14) radiotherapy. Tumorsites were bladder/prostate (n = 27), head/orbit/parameningeal (n = 22), extremity/trunk (n = 14), and retroperitoneum/pelvis (n = 10). RESULTS: Of 14 patients, 1 (7%) with clinical/radiographic complete response (CR) had viable tumor. Of 59 patients, 35 (59%) without CR had viable tumor. Five-year failure-free survival (FFS) rates were 81% in 37 patients without viable tumor and 53% in 36 patients with viable tumor (Cox proportional hazards adjusted P = .05). Five-year FFS rates were 67% in 15 patients with clear margins and 43% in 21 patients with tumor-involved margins (n = 18) or viable gross tumor (n = 3) (Cox proportional hazards adjusted P = .04). Five-year survival was 78% to 79% among 73 patients with and 333 patients without SLP during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Second-look procedures can show whether viable tumor is present and may be beneficial in selected patients with rhabdomyosarcoma. Disappearance of tumor (CR) usually correlated with no viable tumor at SLP. However, 41% of patients without CR had no viable tumor. Those without viable tumor had increased FFS but not survival compared to those with viable tumor.
Authors: W M Crist; J R Anderson; J L Meza; C Fryer; R B Raney; F B Ruymann; J Breneman; S J Qualman; E Wiener; M Wharam; T Lobe; B Webber; H M Maurer; S S Donaldson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-06-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Giovanni Cecchetto; Elena Carretto; Gianni Bisogno; Patrizia Dall'Igna; Andrea Ferrari; Giovanni Scarzello; Alberto Donfrancesco; Rita Alaggio; Paolo Indolfi; Modesto Carli Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: H M Maurer; E A Gehan; M Beltangady; W Crist; P S Dickman; S S Donaldson; C Fryer; D Hammond; D M Hays; J Herrmann Journal: Cancer Date: 1993-03-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: H M Maurer; M Beltangady; E A Gehan; W Crist; D Hammond; D M Hays; R Heyn; W Lawrence; W Newton; J Ortega Journal: Cancer Date: 1988-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: David A Rodeberg; Julie A Stoner; Andrea Hayes-Jordan; Simon C Kao; Suzanne L Wolden; Steve J Qualman; William H Meyer; Douglas S Hawkins Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-05-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: W Crist; E A Gehan; A H Ragab; P S Dickman; S S Donaldson; C Fryer; D Hammond; D M Hays; J Herrmann; R Heyn Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1995-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1977-01 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Timothy B Lautz; Yueh-Yun Chi; Jing Tian; Abha A Gupta; Suzanne L Wolden; Jonathan C Routh; Dana L Casey; Roshni Dasgupta; Douglas S Hawkins; David A Rodeberg Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2020-02-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Maha A T Elsebaie; Mohamed Amgad; Ahmed Elkashash; Ahmed Saber Elgebaly; Gehad Gamal E L Ashal; Emad Shash; Zeinab Elsayed Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 4.379