BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of pelvic origin in boys often involve the urogenital organs. The optimal extensiveness of radical surgery has long been an issue of discussion, since exenterative surgeries result in severe urogenital adverse effects. We conducted a retrospective review of patients with pelvic STS treated in two regional center hospitals and assessed the radicality of surgery and the functional outcome of the bladder. PATIENTS: Medical records and surgical reports of nine cases (embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma 6, malignant triton tumor 2, suspected rhabdomyosarcoma 1) treated within 1997-2012 were reviewed. Site of origin was prostate in seven, retroperitoneal in two. Average follow-up period was 96 months. TREATMENT AND OUTCOME: All cases were subjected to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Response was PR in four, SD in two, and PD in two. Radical surgery resulted in gross total resection in eight, and partial resection in one. Three underwent cystoprostatectomy, two cases underwent prostatectomy, and bladder-preserving tumor resection was carried out in four cases. At the last follow-up, three retained a functional bladder. Two required augmentation cystoplasty with intestinal conduits. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the on-going clinical trials recommend conservative surgery for bladder/prostate rhabdomyosarcoma, and to preserve the bladder function particularly in chemosensitive tumors. Some other groups, however, advocate the importance of radical surgery to prevent local relapse. These reports include heterogenous group of patients in the cohort, and therefore it is difficult to draw a conclusion of which approach truly contributes to the survival of the patients better. Future studies should evaluate bladder and sexual function objectively to establish reliable evidence regarding the benefit and adverse effects of different surgical approaches. These data would be informative to optimize the treatment balance for children with pelvic rhabdomyosarcomas.
BACKGROUND:Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of pelvic origin in boys often involve the urogenital organs. The optimal extensiveness of radical surgery has long been an issue of discussion, since exenterative surgeries result in severe urogenital adverse effects. We conducted a retrospective review of patients with pelvic STS treated in two regional center hospitals and assessed the radicality of surgery and the functional outcome of the bladder. PATIENTS: Medical records and surgical reports of nine cases (embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma 6, malignant triton tumor 2, suspected rhabdomyosarcoma 1) treated within 1997-2012 were reviewed. Site of origin was prostate in seven, retroperitoneal in two. Average follow-up period was 96 months. TREATMENT AND OUTCOME: All cases were subjected to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Response was PR in four, SD in two, and PD in two. Radical surgery resulted in gross total resection in eight, and partial resection in one. Three underwent cystoprostatectomy, two cases underwent prostatectomy, and bladder-preserving tumor resection was carried out in four cases. At the last follow-up, three retained a functional bladder. Two required augmentation cystoplasty with intestinal conduits. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the on-going clinical trials recommend conservative surgery for bladder/prostate rhabdomyosarcoma, and to preserve the bladder function particularly in chemosensitive tumors. Some other groups, however, advocate the importance of radical surgery to prevent local relapse. These reports include heterogenous group of patients in the cohort, and therefore it is difficult to draw a conclusion of which approach truly contributes to the survival of the patients better. Future studies should evaluate bladder and sexual function objectively to establish reliable evidence regarding the benefit and adverse effects of different surgical approaches. These data would be informative to optimize the treatment balance for children with pelvic rhabdomyosarcomas.
Authors: Odile Oberlin; Annie Rey; José Sanchez de Toledo; Hélène Martelli; Meriel E M Jenney; Marcelo Scopinaro; Christophe Bergeron; Johannes H M Merks; Nathalie Bouvet; Caroline Ellershaw; Anna Kelsey; David Spooner; Michael C G Stevens Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-06-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Beverly Raney; Julie Stoner; James Anderson; Richard Andrassy; Carola Arndt; Ken Brown; William Crist; Harold Maurer; Stephen Qualman; Moody Wharam; Eugene Wiener; William Meyer; Andrea Hayes-Jordan Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: David A Rodeberg; James R Anderson; Carola A Arndt; Fernando A Ferrer; Richard Beverly Raney; Meriel E Jenney; Ines B Brecht; Ewa Koscielniak; Modesto Carli; Gianni Bisogno; Odile Oberlin; Annie Rey; Fred Ullrich; Michael C G Stevens; William H Meyer Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: John Breneman; Jane Meza; Sarah S Donaldson; R Beverly Raney; Suzanne Wolden; Jeff Michalski; Fran Laurie; David A Rodeberg; William Meyer; David Walterhouse; Douglas S Hawkins Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-11-19 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Sheri L Spunt; Teresa A Sweeney; Melissa M Hudson; Catherine A Billups; Matthew J Krasin; Allison L Hester Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-10-01 Impact factor: 44.544