Literature DB >> 8448756

The Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study-II.

H M Maurer1, E A Gehan, M Beltangady, W Crist, P S Dickman, S S Donaldson, C Fryer, D Hammond, D M Hays, J Herrmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS)-II, (1978-1984) had the general goals of improving the survival and treatment of children with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS).
METHODS: Nine hundred ninety-nine previously untreated eligible patients entered the study after surgery and were randomized or assigned to therapy by IRS Clinical Group (I-IV), tumor site, and histologic type. Outcomes were compared between treatments and with results of IRS-I (1972-1978).
RESULTS: Patients in Group I, excluding extremity alveolar (EA) RMS, were randomized to standard vincristine (V), dactinomycin (A), and cyclophosphamide (C) or standard VA. At 5 years, disease-free survival (DFS) and survival (S) rates were similar between VAC and VA (DFS: 80%, 70%, P = 0.47; S: 85%, 84%, P = 0.73). Patients in Group II, excluding EA RMS, received radiation and were randomized to intensive VA or repetitive-pulse VAC. Outcomes were similar for rates of DFS (69%, 74%, P = 0.83) and S (88%, 79%, P = 0.17). Patients in Group III, excluding certain pelvic tumors, received radiation and were randomized to repetitive-pulse VAC or repetitive-pulse VAdrC-VAC (Adr, Adriamycin [doxorubicin]). Complete remission (CR) rates were close at 74%, 78%, respectively (P = 0.32), as were percentages in CR (73%) and S (66%) rates; the latter outcomes were significantly better than IRS-I (CR: 56%, P < 0.001; S: 50%, P < 0.001). Central nervous system prophylaxis for Group III patients with cranial parameningeal sarcoma increased S rate to 67% from 45% in IRS-I (P < 0.001). Patients in Group IV received the same regimens as Group III; the CR rate was 53%, 38% remained in CR and S rate was 27% with and 26% without Adr (P = 0.90). At 5 years, S rate for IRS-II, including EA and all pelvic tumors, was 63%: an 8% increase over IRS-I (P < 0.001). Outcomes by primary site were as good as, or better than, the IRS-I experience.
CONCLUSIONS: Combining all Groups and treatments in IRS-II, the major improvement in S rate at 5 years between studies was in nonmetastatic patients (71% for IRS-II versus 63% for IRS-I, P = 0.01).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8448756     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930301)71:5<1904::aid-cncr2820710530>3.0.co;2-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  88 in total

1.  Brachytherapy for solid tumors in children.

Authors:  S Nag
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 2.  Soft tissue sarcomas in children.

Authors:  Gauri Kapoor; Kunal Das
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 3.  Management of sarcomas of the head and neck.

Authors:  Bruce Brockstein
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Local therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma of the hands and feet: is amputation necessary? A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Trang H La; Suzanne L Wolden; Zheng Su; Corinne Linardic; R Lor Randall; Douglas S Hawkins; Sarah S Donaldson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Influence of noncompliance with radiation therapy protocol guidelines and operative bed recurrences for children with rhabdomyosarcoma and microscopic residual disease: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Lynn Million; James Anderson; John Breneman; Douglas S Hawkins; Fran Laurie; Jeff Michalski; David Rodeberg; Moody Wharam; Suzanne Wolden; Sarah S Donaldson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Impact of tumor viability at second-look procedures performed before completing treatment on the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group protocol IRS-IV, 1991-1997: a report from the children's oncology group.

Authors:  Beverly Raney; Julie Stoner; James Anderson; Richard Andrassy; Carola Arndt; Ken Brown; William Crist; Harold Maurer; Stephen Qualman; Moody Wharam; Eugene Wiener; William Meyer; Andrea Hayes-Jordan
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  Massive Embryonal Rhabdomyosarcoma of the Hand in an Infant With Metastasis at Birth: Management Dilemma.

Authors:  Jayakrishnan K Narayana Kurup; Vinay C Kamble; Ashwath M Acharya; Anil K Bhat
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-01-04

8.  The CXCR4-SDF1alpha axis is a critical mediator of rhabdomyosarcoma metastatic signaling induced by bone marrow stroma.

Authors:  Brigitte Strahm; Adam D Durbin; Elizabeth Sexsmith; David Malkin
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 5.150

9.  Vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide compared with vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide alternating with vincristine, topotecan, and cyclophosphamide for intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: children's oncology group study D9803.

Authors:  Carola A S Arndt; Julie A Stoner; Douglas S Hawkins; David A Rodeberg; Andrea A Hayes-Jordan; Charles N Paidas; David M Parham; Lisa A Teot; Moody D Wharam; John C Breneman; Sarah S Donaldson; James R Anderson; William H Meyer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The addition of cixutumumab or temozolomide to intensive multiagent chemotherapy is feasible but does not improve outcome for patients with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Suman Malempati; Brenda J Weigel; Yueh-Yun Chi; Jing Tian; James R Anderson; David M Parham; Lisa A Teot; David A Rodeberg; Torunn I Yock; Barry L Shulkin; Sheri L Spunt; William H Meyer; Douglas S Hawkins
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.