BACKGROUND: Atrial stretch is thought to play a role in the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the precise mechanism by which stretch contributes to AF maintenance in humans is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of left atrial (LA) pressure on AF frequency in patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF. METHODS: The subjects of this study were 58 consecutive patients with persistent AF (n = 40) or paroxysmal AF (n = 18) undergoing LA ablation. LA pressure was measured before ablation. Both atria and the coronary sinus were mapped, and regional dominant frequency (DF) was determined. RESULTS: Mean LA pressure in the persistent AF group was significantly higher than in the paroxysmal AF group (18 ± 5 vs 10 ± 4 mmHg, P <.0001). Mean DF in the persistent AF group was also higher than in the paroxysmal AF group (6.36 ± 0.51 Hz and 5.83 ± 0.54 Hz, P = .0006). In patients with persistent AF, there was a significant correlation between LA pressure and DF at the LA appendage (r = 0.55, P = .0002). DF(max) was found at the LA appendage region in 24 (60%) of the 40 patients with persistent AF (P = .0006). In multivariate analysis, LA pressure was the only independent predictor of DF(max) in the LA appendage (P = .04, odds ratio 1.41, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.94). CONCLUSION: Higher LA pressure in patients with persistent AF implies that these patients are more vulnerable to stretch-related remodeling than are patients with paroxysmal AF. The DF of AF was directly related to LA pressure in patients with persistent AF. This finding suggests that atrial stretch may contribute to the maintenance of AF in humans by stabilizing high-frequency sources.
BACKGROUND: Atrial stretch is thought to play a role in the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the precise mechanism by which stretch contributes to AF maintenance in humans is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of left atrial (LA) pressure on AF frequency in patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF. METHODS: The subjects of this study were 58 consecutive patients with persistent AF (n = 40) or paroxysmal AF (n = 18) undergoing LA ablation. LA pressure was measured before ablation. Both atria and the coronary sinus were mapped, and regional dominant frequency (DF) was determined. RESULTS: Mean LA pressure in the persistent AF group was significantly higher than in the paroxysmal AF group (18 ± 5 vs 10 ± 4 mmHg, P <.0001). Mean DF in the persistent AF group was also higher than in the paroxysmal AF group (6.36 ± 0.51 Hz and 5.83 ± 0.54 Hz, P = .0006). In patients with persistent AF, there was a significant correlation between LA pressure and DF at the LA appendage (r = 0.55, P = .0002). DF(max) was found at the LA appendage region in 24 (60%) of the 40 patients with persistent AF (P = .0006). In multivariate analysis, LA pressure was the only independent predictor of DF(max) in the LA appendage (P = .04, odds ratio 1.41, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.94). CONCLUSION: Higher LA pressure in patients with persistent AF implies that these patients are more vulnerable to stretch-related remodeling than are patients with paroxysmal AF. The DF of AF was directly related to LA pressure in patients with persistent AF. This finding suggests that atrial stretch may contribute to the maintenance of AF in humans by stabilizing high-frequency sources.
Authors: A R Misier; T Opthof; N M van Hemel; J J Defauw; J M de Bakker; M J Janse; F J van Capelle Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1992-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: T Tabata; T Oki; H Yamada; A Iuchi; S Ito; T Hori; T Kitagawa; I Kato; H Kitahata; S Oshita Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1998-02-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Jérôme Kalifa; José Jalife; Alexey V Zaitsev; Suveer Bagwe; Mark Warren; Javier Moreno; Omer Berenfeld; Stanley Nattel Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-08-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: David Filgueiras-Rama; Nicholas F Price; Raphael P Martins; Masatoshi Yamazaki; Uma Mahesh R Avula; Kuljeet Kaur; Jérôme Kalifa; Steven R Ennis; Elliot Hwang; Vijay Devabhaktuni; Jose Jalife; Omer Berenfeld Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2012-10-10
Authors: Markus Linhart; Thorsten Lewalter; Erica L Mittmann-Braun; Nicole C Karbach; René P Andrié; Christoph Hammerstingl; Rolf Fimmers; Jens Kreuz; Georg Nickenig; Jan W Schrickel; Lars M Lickfett Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2013-06-23 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: David Filgueiras-Rama; Raphael P Martins; Sergey Mironov; Masatoshi Yamazaki; Conrado J Calvo; Steve R Ennis; Krishna Bandaru; Sami F Noujaim; Jérôme Kalifa; Omer Berenfeld; José Jalife Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2012-03-30