S Fareh1, C Villemaire, S Nattel. 1. Department of Medicine and Research Center, Montreal Heart Institute and University of Montreal, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rapid atrial activation causes electrical remodeling that promotes the occurrence and the maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF). Although remodeling has been shown to alter electrophysiological variables, the spatial uniformity of these changes is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Dogs subjected to rapid atrial pacing (400 bpm) for 24 hours (n=12) were compared with sham-operated dogs (instrumented but not paced, n=12). Epicardial mapping (240 bipolar electrodes) and extrastimulation at a large number of sites (mean+/-SEM, 66+/-4 per dog) were used to evaluate atrial activation and the heterogeneity of the effective refractory period (ERP), respectively. Rapid pacing increased both the percentage of sites at which AF could be induced by single premature stimuli (from 2.6+/-0.9% to 11.8+/-2.8%, P=0.007) and AF duration (from 39+/-28 to 146+/-49 seconds, P=0.03). Atrial tachycardia decreased atrial ERP (from 120+/-4 to 103+/-2 ms, P=0.003), increased the coefficient of variation of ERP (from 14.9+/-0.9% to 20.7+/-0.9%, P<0.0001), and accelerated conduction velocity (from 91+/-2 to 108+/-3 cm/s, P=0.0004), with no change in the wavelength. The increase in ERP heterogeneity was due both to interregional differences in the extent of ERP remodeling and to increased intersite variability within regions. Stepwise multilinear regression indicated that ERP heterogeneity was an independent determinant of the inducibility (P<0.0001) and duration (P<0.0001) of AF, whereas ERP per se and wavelength were not significant determinants. Combined mapping of AF induction and atrial ERP showed that premature extrastimuli induced AF at sites with short ERP by causing local conduction slowing and/or block in adjacent zones with longer ERP values. CONCLUSIONS: Atrial tachycardia causes nonuniform remodeling of atrial refractoriness that plays an important role in increasing atrial vulnerability to AF induction and the duration of induced AF.
BACKGROUND: Rapid atrial activation causes electrical remodeling that promotes the occurrence and the maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF). Although remodeling has been shown to alter electrophysiological variables, the spatial uniformity of these changes is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS:Dogs subjected to rapid atrial pacing (400 bpm) for 24 hours (n=12) were compared with sham-operated dogs (instrumented but not paced, n=12). Epicardial mapping (240 bipolar electrodes) and extrastimulation at a large number of sites (mean+/-SEM, 66+/-4 per dog) were used to evaluate atrial activation and the heterogeneity of the effective refractory period (ERP), respectively. Rapid pacing increased both the percentage of sites at which AF could be induced by single premature stimuli (from 2.6+/-0.9% to 11.8+/-2.8%, P=0.007) and AF duration (from 39+/-28 to 146+/-49 seconds, P=0.03). Atrial tachycardia decreased atrial ERP (from 120+/-4 to 103+/-2 ms, P=0.003), increased the coefficient of variation of ERP (from 14.9+/-0.9% to 20.7+/-0.9%, P<0.0001), and accelerated conduction velocity (from 91+/-2 to 108+/-3 cm/s, P=0.0004), with no change in the wavelength. The increase in ERP heterogeneity was due both to interregional differences in the extent of ERP remodeling and to increased intersite variability within regions. Stepwise multilinear regression indicated that ERP heterogeneity was an independent determinant of the inducibility (P<0.0001) and duration (P<0.0001) of AF, whereas ERP per se and wavelength were not significant determinants. Combined mapping of AF induction and atrial ERP showed that premature extrastimuli induced AF at sites with short ERP by causing local conduction slowing and/or block in adjacent zones with longer ERP values. CONCLUSIONS:Atrial tachycardia causes nonuniform remodeling of atrial refractoriness that plays an important role in increasing atrial vulnerability to AF induction and the duration of induced AF.
Authors: F X Roithinger; M R Karch; P R Steiner; A SippensGroenewegen; M D Lesh Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Kentaro Yoshida; Magnus Ulfarsson; Hakan Oral; Thomas Crawford; Eric Good; Krit Jongnarangsin; Frank Bogun; Frank Pelosi; Jose Jalife; Fred Morady; Aman Chugh Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 6.343