Literature DB >> 1279534

Effects of an acute increase in atrial pressure on atrial refractoriness in humans.

H Calkins1, R el-Atassi, S Kalbfleisch, J Langberg, F Morady.   

Abstract

Contraction-excitation feedback has been studied extensively in mammalian ventricles. In contrast, little is known about contraction-excitation feedback in mammalian atria. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of acute alterations in atrial pressure, induced by varying the atrioventricular (AV) interval, on atrial refractoriness. Twenty patients without structural heart disease participated in the study. In each patient the atrial effective (ERP) and absolute refractory periods (ARP) were measured during AV pacing at a cycle length of 500 msec and an AV interval of 120 msec. Acute increases in atrial pressure were induced by pacing the atrium and ventricle simultaneously for the final two beats of the drive train. The ERP was defined as the longest extrastimulus coupling interval that failed to capture with an extrastimulus current strength of twice the stimulation threshold. The ARP was defined in a similar manner with an extrastimulus current strength of 10 mA. The ERP and ARP were determined using the incremental extrastimulus technique. A subset of patients had the pacing protocol performed during autonomic blockade. As the AV interval of the final two beats of the drive train was shortened from 120 msec to 0 msec, the peak right atrial pressure increased from 7 +/- 3 mmHg to 15 +/- 5 mmHg (P < 0.001). The increase in atrial pressure associated with simultaneous pacing of the atrium and ventricle resulted in shortening of the atrial ERP and ARP by 7.3 +/- 5.2 and 6.2 +/- 3.5 msec, respectively (P < 0.001). Similar results were obtained during autonomic blockade. these findings confirm the presence of contraction-excitation feedback in normal human atria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1279534     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb02954.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  14 in total

1.  Left atrial pressure and dominant frequency of atrial fibrillation in humans.

Authors:  Kentaro Yoshida; Magnus Ulfarsson; Hakan Oral; Thomas Crawford; Eric Good; Krit Jongnarangsin; Frank Bogun; Frank Pelosi; Jose Jalife; Fred Morady; Aman Chugh
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  Remodeling of atrial ATP-sensitive K⁺ channels in a model of salt-induced elevated blood pressure.

Authors:  Joshua M Lader; Carolina Vasquez; Li Bao; Karen Maass; Jiaxiang Qu; Eirini Kefalogianni; Glenn I Fishman; William A Coetzee; Gregory E Morley
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: clinical and electrophysiological features and predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence following elimination of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Authors:  Basri Amasyali; Sedat Kose; Kudret Aytemir; Ayhan Kilic; Gulumser Heper; Hurkan Kursaklioglu; Atila Iyisoy; Turgay Celik; E Bariş Kaya; Ersoy Isik
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  Atrial Remodeling And Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanistic Interactions And Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Bandar Al Ghamdi; Walid Hassan
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2009-06-01

5.  Clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of the patients with relatively slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Authors:  Harun Evrengul; Yusuf I Alihanoglu; I Dogu Kilic; Bekir S Yildiz; Sedat Kose
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Effect of atrial pressure increase on effective refractory period and vulnerability to atrial fibrillation in patients with lone atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  M Efremidis; A Sideris; E Prappa; G Filippatos; G Fillipatos; D Athanasias; D Kardara; I Sioras; F Kardaras
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Evidence of mechanoelectric feedback in the atria of patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Authors:  Emmanuel G Manios; Hercules E Mavrakis; Emmanuel M Kanoupakis; Eleftherios M Kallergis; Panagiotis K Kafarakis; Panos E Vardas
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 8.  Behavioral influences on cardiac arrhythmias.

Authors:  Rachel Lampert
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 6.677

9.  The usefulness of minimal ventricular pacing and preventive AF algorithms in the treatment of PAF: the 'MinVPace' study.

Authors:  Rick A Veasey; Anita Arya; Nick Freemantle; John Silberbauer; Nikhil R Patel; Guy W Lloyd; A Neil Sulke
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-01-16       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Angiotensin II type 1 receptor mediates partially hyposmotic-induced increase of I (Ks) current in guinea pig atrium.

Authors:  Dimitar P Zankov; Futoshi Toyoda; Mariko Omatsu-Kanbe; Hiroshi Matsuura; Minoru Horie
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.657

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.