Literature DB >> 21031513

Myocardial T2* is not affected by ageing, myocardial fibrosis, or impaired left ventricular function.

Paul Kirk1, Gillian C Smith, Michael Roughton, T He, Dudley J Pennell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of alterations in myocardial structure and function from increasing age, myocardial fibrosis, or impaired left ventricular function on myocardial T2*.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Myocardial T2* was measured in 126 subjects without cardiac iron loading, of whom 63 were normals of varying ages, 39 were patients with impaired left ventricular function from various nonsiderotic cardiac causes, and 24 were patients with chronic myocardial infarction affecting the interventricular septum (where myocardial T2* measurements are normally made).
RESULTS: The median (Q1, Q3) of myocardial T2* in the normals was 36.3 ms (31.6, 45.4). There was no significant correlation between myocardial T2* and age (R(2) = 0.04; P = 0.11). In the patients with impaired left ventricular function, the median myocardial T2* was 35.5 ms (31, 42.2) (P = 0.34 versus normals). There was no significant correlation between ejection fraction and T2* in patients with left ventricular impairment (R(2) = 0.03; P = 0.33). In the patients with septal infarction, the median septal myocardial T2* was 35.4 ms (32.7, 43) (P = 0.81 vs normals).
CONCLUSION: There was no significant change in myocardial T2* associated with any alterations of myocardial structure and function occurring with increasing age, impairment of left ventricular function or septal fibrosis from chronic myocardial infarction. These results indicate that myocardial T2* measurements are robust to these potential confounding parameters.
© 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21031513     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  10 in total

1.  Automated T(2) * measurements using supplementary field mapping to assess cardiac iron content.

Authors:  Brian A Taylor; Ralf B Loeffler; Ruitian Song; Mary E McCarville; Jane S Hankins; Claudia M Hillenbrand
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Reference ranges ("normal values") for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in adults and children: 2020 update.

Authors:  Nadine Kawel-Boehm; Scott J Hetzel; Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; Gabriella Captur; Christopher J Francois; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Michael Salerno; Shawn D Teague; Emanuela Valsangiacomo-Buechel; Rob J van der Geest; David A Bluemke
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 5.364

3.  T1 and T2∗ relaxation time in the parcellated myocardium of healthy Taiwanese participants: A single center study.

Authors:  Chih-Chien Tsai; Shu-Hang Ng; Yao-Liang Chen; Yu-Hsiang Juan; Chao-Hung Wang; Gigin Lin; Chih-Wei Chien; Yu-Ching Lin; Yu-Chun Lin; Yu-Chieh Huang; Pei-Ching Huang; Jiun-Jie Wang
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Recent advances in β-thalassemias.

Authors:  Antonio Cao; Paolo Moi; Renzo Galanello
Journal:  Pediatr Rep       Date:  2011-06-16

Review 5.  Normal values for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults and children.

Authors:  Nadine Kawel-Boehm; Alicia Maceira; Emanuela R Valsangiacomo-Buechel; Jens Vogel-Claussen; Evrim B Turkbey; Rupert Williams; Sven Plein; Michael Tee; John Eng; David A Bluemke
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: A consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI).

Authors:  Daniel R Messroghli; James C Moon; Vanessa M Ferreira; Lars Grosse-Wortmann; Taigang He; Peter Kellman; Julia Mascherbauer; Reza Nezafat; Michael Salerno; Erik B Schelbert; Andrew J Taylor; Richard Thompson; Martin Ugander; Ruud B van Heeswijk; Matthias G Friedrich
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  The influence of microvascular injury on native T1 and T2* relaxation values after acute myocardial infarction: implications for non-contrast-enhanced infarct assessment.

Authors:  Lourens F H J Robbers; Robin Nijveldt; Aernout M Beek; Paul F A Teunissen; Maurits R Hollander; P Stefan Biesbroek; Henk Everaars; Peter M van de Ven; Mark B M Hofman; Niels van Royen; Albert C van Rossum
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  T1 mapping in cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Dina Radenkovic; Sebastian Weingärtner; Lewis Ricketts; James C Moon; Gabriella Captur
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.214

9.  Mechanisms Underlying the Association of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With Heart Failure.

Authors:  Jakub Lagan; Erik B Schelbert; Josephine H Naish; Jørgen Vestbo; Christien Fortune; Joshua Bradley; John Belcher; Edward Hearne; Foluwakemi Ogunyemi; Richard Timoney; Daniel Prescott; Hamish D C Bain; Tasneem Bangi; Mahvash Zaman; Christopher Wong; Anthony Ashworth; Helen Thorpe; Robin Egdell; Jerome McIntosh; Bruce R Irwin; David Clark; Graham Devereux; Jennifer K Quint; Richard Barraclough; Matthias Schmitt; Christopher A Miller
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-05-19

10.  T1 at 1.5T and 3T compared with conventional T2* at 1.5T for cardiac siderosis.

Authors:  Mohammed H Alam; Dominique Auger; Gillian C Smith; Taigang He; Vassilis Vassiliou; A John Baksi; Rick Wage; Peter Drivas; Yanqiu Feng; David N Firmin; Dudley J Pennell
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 5.364

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.