Literature DB >> 24179480

Screening colonoscopy bowel preparation: experience in an urban minority population.

Corey H Basch1, Charles E Basch, Randi L Wolf, Patricia Zybert, Benjamin Lebwohl, Celia Shmukler, Alfred I Neugut, Steven Shea.   

Abstract

METHODS: Suboptimal bowel preparation, present in over 20% of colonoscopies, can severely compromise the effectiveness of the colonoscopy procedure. We surveyed 93 primarily urban minority men and women who underwent asymptomatic 'screening' colonoscopy regarding their precolonoscopy bowel-preparation experience.
RESULTS: Print materials alone (39.8%) and in-person verbal instructions alone (35.5%) were reportedly the most common modes of instruction from the gastroenterologists. Liquid-containing laxative (70.6%) was the most common laxative agent; a clear liquid diet (69.6%) the most common dietary restriction. Almost half of the participants mentioned 'getting the laxative down' as one of the hardest parts of the preparation; 40.9% mentioned dietary restrictions. The 24.7% who mentioned 'understanding the instructions' as one of the hardest parts were more likely to be non-US born and to have lower education and income. There was no relationship between difficulty in understanding instructions and mode of instruction or preparation protocol. One quarter suggested that a smaller volume and/or more palatable liquid would have made the preparation easier. Three quarters agreed that it would have been helpful to have someone to guide them through the preparation process.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a variety of opportunities for both physician- and patient-directed educational interventions to promote higher rates of optimal colonoscopy bowel preparation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer screening; bowel preparation; colonoscopy

Year:  2013        PMID: 24179480      PMCID: PMC3808570          DOI: 10.1177/1756283X13498661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1756-283X            Impact factor:   4.409


  22 in total

1.  The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists' recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy.

Authors:  Shomron Ben-Horin; Simon Bar-Meir; Benjamin Avidan
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Randomized, controlled study of pretreatment with magnesium citrate on the quality of colonoscopy preparation with polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution.

Authors:  V K Sharma; E N Steinberg; R Vasudeva; C W Howden
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Reena V Chokshi; Christine E Hovis; Thomas Hollander; Dayna S Early; Jean S Wang
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Development and validation of a novel patient educational booklet to enhance colonoscopy preparation.

Authors:  Brennan M R Spiegel; Jennifer Talley; Paul Shekelle; Nikhil Agarwal; Bradley Snyder; Roger Bolus; Nicole Kurzbard; Michael Chan; Andrew Ho; Marc Kaneshiro; Kristina Cordasco; Hartley Cohen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Colorectal cancer stage at diagnosis by socioeconomic and urban/rural status in California, 1988-2000.

Authors:  Arti Parikh-Patel; Janet H Bates; Sharan Campleman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Todd W Kilgore; Abdillahi A Abdinoor; Nicholas M Szary; Samuel W Schowengerdt; Jamie B Yust; Abhishek Choudhary; Michelle L Matteson; Srinivas R Puli; John B Marshall; Matthew L Bechtold
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.

Authors:  Florian Froehlich; Vincent Wietlisbach; Jean-Jacques Gonvers; Bernard Burnand; John-Paul Vader
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Thomas F Imperiale; Danielle R Latinovich; L Lisa Bratcher
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Telephone-based re-education on the day before colonoscopy improves the quality of bowel preparation and the polyp detection rate: a prospective, colonoscopist-blinded, randomised, controlled study.

Authors:  Xiaodong Liu; Hui Luo; Lin Zhang; Felix W Leung; Zhiguo Liu; Xiangping Wang; Rui Huang; Na Hui; Kaichun Wu; Daiming Fan; Yanglin Pan; Xuegang Guo
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Bisacodyl reduces the volume of polyethylene glycol solution required for bowel preparation.

Authors:  W J Adams; A P Meagher; D Z Lubowski; D W King
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  2 in total

1.  Analysis of YouTubeTM videos related to bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Corey Hannah Basch; Grace Clarke Hillyer; Rachel Reeves; Charles E Basch
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-09-16

2.  Are YouTube Videos a Reliable Source for Obtaining Information About Colorectal Cancer Screening?

Authors:  Omer Yalkin; Mustafa Y Uzunoglu; Nidal İflazoglu; Ebru Esen
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.