Literature DB >> 12509821

Comparison of quantitative shear wave MR-elastography with mechanical compression tests.

U Hamhaber1, F A Grieshaber, J H Nagel, U Klose.   

Abstract

The mechanical properties of in vivo soft tissue are generally determined by palpation, ultrasound measurements (US), and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). While it has been shown that US and MRE are capable of quantitatively measuring soft tissue elasticity, there is still some uncertainty about the reliability of quantitative MRE measurements. For this reason it was decided to determine in vitro how MRE measurements correspond with other quantitative methods of measuring characteristic elasticity values. This article presents the results of experiments with tissue-like agar-agar gel phantoms in which the wavelength of strain waves was measured by shear wave MR elastography and the resultant shear modulus was compared with results from mechanical compression tests with small gel specimens. The shear moduli of nine homogeneous gels with various agar-agar concentrations were investigated. The elasticity range of the gels covered the elasticity range of typical soft tissues. The systematic comparison between shear wave MRE and compression tests showed good agreement between the two measurement techniques. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12509821     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  27 in total

1.  Characterization of a hyper-viscoelastic phantom mimicking biological soft tissue using an abdominal pneumatic driver with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE).

Authors:  Gwladys E Leclerc; Laëtitia Debernard; Félix Foucart; Ludovic Robert; Kay M Pelletier; Fabrice Charleux; Richard Ehman; Marie-Christine Ho Ba Tho; Sabine F Bensamoun
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Effects of frequency- and direction-dependent elastic materials on linearly elastic MRE image reconstructions.

Authors:  I M Perreard; A J Pattison; M Doyley; M D J McGarry; Z Barani; E E Van Houten; J B Weaver; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis using ultrasound-based shear wave measurement and comparison to magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Heng Zhao; Jun Chen; Duane D Meixner; Hua Xie; Vijay Shamdasani; Shiwei Zhou; Jean-Luc Robert; Matthew W Urban; William Sanchez; Matthew R Callstrom; Richard L Ehman; James F Greenleaf; Shigao Chen
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Soft tissue elastometer.

Authors:  V Egorov; S Tsyuryupa; S Kanilo; M Kogit; A Sarvazyan
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Magnetic resonance elastography compared with rotational rheometry for in vitro brain tissue viscoelasticity measurement.

Authors:  Jonathan Vappou; Elodie Breton; Philippe Choquet; Christian Goetz; Rémy Willinger; André Constantinesco
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Congruence of imaging estimators and mechanical measurements of viscoelastic properties of soft tissues.

Authors:  Man Zhang; Benjamin Castaneda; Zhe Wu; Priya Nigwekar; Jean V Joseph; Deborah J Rubens; Kevin J Parker
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Shear modulus imaging by direct visualization of propagating shear waves with phase-sensitive optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Shaozhen Song; Zhihong Huang; Thu-Mai Nguyen; Emily Y Wong; Bastien Arnal; Matthew O'Donnell; Ruikang K Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  Magnetic Resonance Measurement of Transient Shear Wave Propagation in a Viscoelastic Gel Cylinder.

Authors:  P V Bayly; P G Massouros; E Christoforou; A Sabet; G M Genin
Journal:  J Mech Phys Solids       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.471

9.  Weak synchronization and large-scale collective oscillation in dense bacterial suspensions.

Authors:  Chong Chen; Song Liu; Xia-Qing Shi; Hugues Chaté; Yilin Wu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Shearwave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (SDUV) on swine kidney.

Authors:  Carolina Amador; Matthew W Urban; Shigao Chen; James F Greenleaf
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.