Literature DB >> 21030737

Quartets MaxCut: a divide and conquer quartets algorithm.

Sagi Snir1, Satish Rao.   

Abstract

Accurate phylogenetic reconstruction methods are currently limited to a maximum of few dozens of taxa. Supertree methods construct a large tree over a large set of taxa, from a set of small trees over overlapping subsets of the complete taxa set. Hence, in order to construct the tree of life over a million and a half different species, the use of a supertree method over the product of accurate methods, is inevitable. Perhaps the simplest version of this task that is still widely applicable, yet quite challenging, is quartet-based reconstruction. This problem lies at the root of many tree reconstruction methods and theoretical as well as experimental results have been reported. Nevertheless, dealing with false, conflicting quartet trees remains problematic. In this paper, we describe an algorithm for constructing a tree from a set of input quartet trees even with a significant fraction of errors. We show empirically that conflicts in the inputs are handled satisfactorily and that it significantly outperforms and outraces the Matrix Representation with Parsimony (MRP) methods that have previously been most successful in dealing with supertrees. Our algorithm is based on a divide and conquer algorithm where our divide step uses a semidefinite programming (SDP) formulation of MaxCut. We remark that this builds on previous work of ours for piecing together trees from rooted triplet trees. The recursion for unrooted quartets, however, is more complicated in that even with completely consistent set of quartet trees the problem is NP-hard, as opposed to the problem for triples where there is a linear time algorithm. This complexity leads to several issues and some solutions of possible independent interest.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21030737     DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2008.133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform        ISSN: 1545-5963            Impact factor:   3.710


  15 in total

1.  Bayes estimators for phylogenetic reconstruction.

Authors:  P M Huggins; W Li; D Haws; T Friedrich; J Liu; R Yoshida
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  Recovering the treelike trend of evolution despite extensive lateral genetic transfer: a probabilistic analysis.

Authors:  Sebastien Roch; Sagi Snir
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  The Performance of Two Supertree Schemes Compared Using Synthetic and Real Data Quartet Input.

Authors:  Eliran Avni; Zahi Yona; Reuven Cohen; Sagi Snir
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  BCD Beam Search: considering suboptimal partial solutions in Bad Clade Deletion supertrees.

Authors:  Markus Fleischauer; Sebastian Böcker
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Comparing algorithms that reconstruct cell lineage trees utilizing information on microsatellite mutations.

Authors:  Noa Chapal-Ilani; Yosef E Maruvka; Adam Spiro; Yitzhak Reizel; Rivka Adar; Liran I Shlush; Ehud Shapiro
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Topological Metrizations of Trees, and New Quartet Methods of Tree Inference.

Authors:  John A Rhodes
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  A New Phylogenomic Approach For Quantifying Horizontal Gene Transfer Trends in Prokaryotes.

Authors:  Eliran Avni; Sagi Snir
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  An experimental study of Quartets MaxCut and other supertree methods.

Authors:  M Shel Swenson; Rahul Suri; C Randal Linder; Tandy Warnow
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 1.405

9.  Accurate phylogenetic tree reconstruction from quartets: a heuristic approach.

Authors:  Rezwana Reaz; Md Shamsuzzoha Bayzid; M Sohel Rahman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Collecting reliable clades using the Greedy Strict Consensus Merger.

Authors:  Markus Fleischauer; Sebastian Böcker
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.