Literature DB >> 24244121

Comparing algorithms that reconstruct cell lineage trees utilizing information on microsatellite mutations.

Noa Chapal-Ilani1, Yosef E Maruvka, Adam Spiro, Yitzhak Reizel, Rivka Adar, Liran I Shlush, Ehud Shapiro.   

Abstract

Organism cells proliferate and die to build, maintain, renew and repair it. The cellular history of an organism up to any point in time can be captured by a cell lineage tree in which vertices represent all organism cells, past and present, and directed edges represent progeny relations among them. The root represents the fertilized egg, and the leaves represent extant and dead cells. Somatic mutations accumulated during cell division endow each organism cell with a genomic signature that is unique with a very high probability. Distances between such genomic signatures can be used to reconstruct an organism's cell lineage tree. Cell populations possess unique features that are absent or rare in organism populations (e.g., the presence of stem cells and a small number of generations since the zygote) and do not undergo sexual reproduction, hence the reconstruction of cell lineage trees calls for careful examination and adaptation of the standard tools of population genetics. Our lab developed a method for reconstructing cell lineage trees by examining only mutations in highly variable microsatellite loci (MS, also called short tandem repeats, STR). In this study we use experimental data on somatic mutations in MS of individual cells in human and mice in order to validate and quantify the utility of known lineage tree reconstruction algorithms in this context. We employed extensive measurements of somatic mutations in individual cells which were isolated from healthy and diseased tissues of mice and humans. The validation was done by analyzing the ability to infer known and clear biological scenarios. In general, we found that if the biological scenario is simple, almost all algorithms tested can infer it. Another somewhat surprising conclusion is that the best algorithm among those tested is Neighbor Joining where the distance measure used is normalized absolute distance. We include our full dataset in Tables S1, S2, S3, S4, S5 to enable further analysis of this data by others.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24244121      PMCID: PMC3828138          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol        ISSN: 1553-734X            Impact factor:   4.475


  43 in total

1.  MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models.

Authors:  Fredrik Ronquist; John P Huelsenbeck
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA.

Authors:  N Takezaki; M Nei
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  N Saitou; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  A model of mutation appropriate to estimate the number of electrophoretically detectable alleles in a finite population.

Authors:  T Ohta; M Kimura
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates.

Authors:  M K Kuhner; J Felsenstein
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  J E Sulston; E Schierenberg; J G White; J N Thomson
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.582

7.  Colorectal adenoma and cancer divergence. Evidence of multilineage progression.

Authors:  J L Tsao; S Tavaré; R Salovaara; J R Jass; L A Aaltonen; D Shibata
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Involvement of mouse Mlh1 in DNA mismatch repair and meiotic crossing over.

Authors:  S M Baker; A W Plug; T A Prolla; C E Bronner; A C Harris; X Yao; D M Christie; C Monell; N Arnheim; A Bradley; T Ashley; R M Liskay
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Origin of HIV-1 in the chimpanzee Pan troglodytes troglodytes.

Authors:  F Gao; E Bailes; D L Robertson; Y Chen; C M Rodenburg; S F Michael; L B Cummins; L O Arthur; M Peeters; G M Shaw; P M Sharp; B H Hahn
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-02-04       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Genome-wide analysis of microsatellite repeats in humans: their abundance and density in specific genomic regions.

Authors:  Subbaya Subramanian; Rakesh K Mishra; Lalji Singh
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  The overdue promise of short tandem repeat variation for heritability.

Authors:  Maximilian O Press; Keisha D Carlson; Christine Queitsch
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Synthetic recording and in situ readout of lineage information in single cells.

Authors:  Kirsten L Frieda; James M Linton; Sahand Hormoz; Joonhyuk Choi; Ke-Huan K Chow; Zakary S Singer; Mark W Budde; Michael B Elowitz; Long Cai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Recent advances in single-cell sequencing technologies.

Authors:  Lu Wen; Fuchou Tang
Journal:  Precis Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-31

4.  Empirical single-cell tracking and cell-fate simulation reveal dual roles of p53 in tumor suppression.

Authors:  Ann Rancourt; Sachiko Sato; Masahiko S Satoh
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 5.  A metabolic perspective of Peto's paradox and cancer.

Authors:  Chi V Dang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Lineage grammars: describing, simulating and analyzing population dynamics.

Authors:  Adam Spiro; Luca Cardelli; Ehud Shapiro
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  RETrace: simultaneous retrospective lineage tracing and methylation profiling of single cells.

Authors:  Christopher Jen-Yue Wei; Kun Zhang
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Retrospective cell lineage reconstruction in humans by using short tandem repeats.

Authors:  Liming Tao; Ofir Raz; Zipora Marx; Manjusha S Ghosh; Sandra Huber; Julia Greindl-Junghans; Tamir Biezuner; Shiran Amir; Lilach Milo; Rivka Adar; Ron Levy; Amos Onn; Noa Chapal-Ilani; Veronika Berman; Asaf Ben Arie; Guy Rom; Barak Oron; Ruth Halaban; Zbigniew T Czyz; Melanie Werner-Klein; Christoph A Klein; Ehud Shapiro
Journal:  Cell Rep Methods       Date:  2021-07-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.