INTRODUCTION: The relationship between self-reported function and objective measures of physiological function among disabled older women was analyzed to determine the validity of self-reported function, and to identify the hierarchy of self-reported task difficulty most associated with loss of independence as a basis to inform treatment progress goals. METHODS: A randomly selected population of older women with moderate to high disability was selected from community-dwelling women 65 to 101 years old from the Women's Health and Aging Study I baseline evaluation (n = 987). Cross-sectional analyses evaluated the association of self-reported function with objective physiological impairment measures. RESULTS: The results indicated that (1) disabled older women self-reported a broad range of physical function levels; (2) self-reported function correlated closely with objective measures of physiological impairments; (3) "preclinical disability," as measured by self-reported modification of task performance in the absence of perceived difficulty, has validity even in a disabled population, and identifies a group intermediate between those who are high functioning in a task and those with difficulty; and (4) there is an apparent gradation in physiological impairment measures with reported loss of functional independence. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest the validity of self-report functional disability measures and the potential to use these measures to identify already-disabled older adults at risk for further functional degradation and potential targets for intervention.
INTRODUCTION: The relationship between self-reported function and objective measures of physiological function among disabled older women was analyzed to determine the validity of self-reported function, and to identify the hierarchy of self-reported task difficulty most associated with loss of independence as a basis to inform treatment progress goals. METHODS: A randomly selected population of older women with moderate to high disability was selected from community-dwelling women 65 to 101 years old from the Women's Health and Aging Study I baseline evaluation (n = 987). Cross-sectional analyses evaluated the association of self-reported function with objective physiological impairment measures. RESULTS: The results indicated that (1) disabled older women self-reported a broad range of physical function levels; (2) self-reported function correlated closely with objective measures of physiological impairments; (3) "preclinical disability," as measured by self-reported modification of task performance in the absence of perceived difficulty, has validity even in a disabled population, and identifies a group intermediate between those who are high functioning in a task and those with difficulty; and (4) there is an apparent gradation in physiological impairment measures with reported loss of functional independence. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest the validity of self-report functional disability measures and the potential to use these measures to identify already-disabled older adults at risk for further functional degradation and potential targets for intervention.
Authors: Rita Rastogi Kalyani; Nan Ji; Mercedes Carnethon; Alain G Bertoni; Elizabeth Selvin; Edward W Gregg; Mario Sims; Sherita Hill Golden Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: Dae Hyun Kim; Jonathan Afilalo; Sandra M Shi; Jeffrey J Popma; Kamal R Khabbaz; Roger J Laham; Francine Grodstein; Kimberly Guibone; Eliah Lux; Lewis A Lipsitz Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Ling Cai; George Luta; Gretchen Kimmick; Jonathan Clapp; Claudine Isaacs; Brandeyln Pitcher; William Barry; Eric Winer; Stephen Sugarman; Clifford Hudis; Hyman Muss; Harvey J Cohen; Arti Hurria Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-03-31 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Nigel Field; Catherine H Mercer; Pam Sonnenberg; Clare Tanton; Soazig Clifton; Kirstin R Mitchell; Bob Erens; Wendy Macdowall; Frederick Wu; Jessica Datta; Kyle G Jones; Amy Stevens; Philip Prah; Andrew J Copas; Andrew Phelps; Kaye Wellings; Anne M Johnson Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-11-26 Impact factor: 79.321