John K Petrella1, M Elaine Cress. 1. Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Muscle Research Laboratory, University of Alabama-Birmingham, AL 35233, USA. jpetrella@physiology.uab.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine differences in daily ambulation activity and task modification between community-dwelling older adults above and below an empirically derived physical threshold that has been linked to independence. METHODS: 20 community-dwelling older adults (72.8 +/- 6 years) were categorized into groups based on functional performance using the Continuous scale Physical Functional Performance Test total score (Cs-PFP). Individuals with Cs-PFP > or =57 were assigned to the high functioning group (HIGH; n=10) with all others assigned to the lower functioning group (LOW; Cs-PFP<57; n=10). Dependent variables included steps/day, number of tasks reported with difficulty, and number of tasks reported with modification. RESULTS: HIGH took significantly more steps/day (HIGH: 9503 +/- 4623; LOW: 5048 +/- 2917, p=.019) compared to LOW. Groups reported having difficulty with a similar number of tasks (HIGH: 0.4 +/- 1; LOW: 1.0 +/- 1, p=.092) but LOW reported modifying a significantly larger number of tasks (HIGH: 0.3 +/- 1; LOW 1.4 +/- 1, p=.049). CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with preclinical disability have reduced daily ambulatory activity compared to older adults with high function despite a similar independent living status. Individuals compensate for reduced physical reserves by modifying the method of performing a task. Identifying early declines in physical ability through task modification and daily ambulation will provide the opportunity for timely intervention to older adults desiring to remain independent within a community-dwelling environment.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine differences in daily ambulation activity and task modification between community-dwelling older adults above and below an empirically derived physical threshold that has been linked to independence. METHODS: 20 community-dwelling older adults (72.8 +/- 6 years) were categorized into groups based on functional performance using the Continuous scale Physical Functional Performance Test total score (Cs-PFP). Individuals with Cs-PFP > or =57 were assigned to the high functioning group (HIGH; n=10) with all others assigned to the lower functioning group (LOW; Cs-PFP<57; n=10). Dependent variables included steps/day, number of tasks reported with difficulty, and number of tasks reported with modification. RESULTS: HIGH took significantly more steps/day (HIGH: 9503 +/- 4623; LOW: 5048 +/- 2917, p=.019) compared to LOW. Groups reported having difficulty with a similar number of tasks (HIGH: 0.4 +/- 1; LOW: 1.0 +/- 1, p=.092) but LOW reported modifying a significantly larger number of tasks (HIGH: 0.3 +/- 1; LOW 1.4 +/- 1, p=.049). CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with preclinical disability have reduced daily ambulatory activity compared to older adults with high function despite a similar independent living status. Individuals compensate for reduced physical reserves by modifying the method of performing a task. Identifying early declines in physical ability through task modification and daily ambulation will provide the opportunity for timely intervention to older adults desiring to remain independent within a community-dwelling environment.
Authors: Torrance J Higgins; Christopher M Janelle; Kelly M Naugle; Jeffrey Knaggs; Brian M Hoover; Michael Marsiske; Todd M Manini Journal: Arch Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2012-07-06 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Rebecca A Gary; M Elaine Cress; Melinda K Higgins; Andrew L Smith; Sandra B Dunbar Journal: J Cardiovasc Nurs Date: 2012 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.083
Authors: Carlos O Weiss; Jennifer L Wolff; Brian Egleston; Christopher L Seplaki; Linda P Fried Journal: Arch Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Andrew A Pellett; Leann Myers; Michael Welsch; S Michal Jazwinski; David A Welsh Journal: J Aging Phys Act Date: 2012-12-10 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Gitte S Jensen; David M Ager; Kimberlee A Redman; Marcie A Mitzner; Kathleen F Benson; Alexander G Schauss Journal: J Med Food Date: 2011-04-06 Impact factor: 2.786