Literature DB >> 21029903

Long-term comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis: mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser flap creation.

Gonzalo Muñoz1, César Albarrán-Diego, Teresa Ferrer-Blasco, Santiago García-Lázaro, Alejandro Cerviño-Expósito.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compute and compare visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and anterior corneal aberration changes after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with flap creation by a mechanical microkeratome and by a femtosecond laser.
SETTING: Private practice refractive surgery center, Valencia, Spain.
DESIGN: Comparative case series.
METHODS: Patients were assigned to have LASIK flap creation with a mechanical microkeratome (Carriazo-Barraquer) or a femtosecond laser (IntraLase). The Visx S2 excimer laser was used for myopic ablation in all cases. Main outcome measures included uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities and the defocus equivalent. Higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were computed from the anterior corneal surface measured with topography for 4.0 mm and 6.0 mm pupil diameters before and 48 months after surgery.
RESULTS: The study evaluated 50 patients (98 eyes). The root mean square of HOAs increased postoperatively by a factor of approximately 1.9 in both groups and with both pupil diameters. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in the increase in anterior corneal aberrations, mean postoperative visual acuity, or residual refraction. All visual and optical performance metrics remained stable throughout the 4-year follow-up. There were no complications with flap creation and no postoperative complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The increase in anterior corneal aberrations after myopic LASIK was similar after mechanical microkeratome and femtosecond laser flap creation. Visual acuity, refraction, and the optical quality of the cornea after LASIK remained stable through 4 years postoperatively in both groups.
Copyright © 2010 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21029903     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.06.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of corneal sensitivity between FS-LASIK and femtosecond lenticule extraction (ReLEx flex) or small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx smile) for myopic eyes.

Authors:  Shengsheng Wei; Yan Wang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Clinical study of customized aspherical intraocular lens implants.

Authors:  Lie-Xi Jia; Zhao-Hui Li
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Nicolás Kahuam-López; Alejandro Navas; Carlos Castillo-Salgado; Enrique O Graue-Hernandez; Aida Jimenez-Corona; Antonio Ibarra
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-07

4.  Comparison of visual performance recovery after thin-flap LASIK with 4 femtosecond lasers.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Yue-Hua Zhou; Yan Zheng; Qian Liu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Astigmatism induced by conventional spherical ablation after PRK and LASIK in myopia with astigmatism < 1.00 D.

Authors:  Steven M Christiansen; Mark D Mifflin; Jason N Edmonds; Rachel G Simpson; Majid Moshirfar
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-20

6.  Effect of Myopic Defocus on Visual Acuity after Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation and Wavefront-guided Laser in Situ Keratomileusis.

Authors:  Kazutaka Kamiya; Kimiya Shimizu; Akihito Igarashi; Takushi Kawamorita
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Refractive and Aberration Outcomes after Customized Photorefractive Keratectomy in Comparison with Customized Femtosecond Laser.

Authors:  Valleh Sajjadi; Mohammad Ghoreishi; Ebrahim Jafarzadehpour
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2015

Review 8.  The evolution of corneal and refractive surgery with the femtosecond laser.

Authors:  Antonis Aristeidou; Elise V Taniguchi; Michael Tsatsos; Rodrigo Muller; Colm McAlinden; Roberto Pineda; Eleftherios I Paschalis
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2015-07-14

9.  Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome-assisted flap creation for LASIK: a prospective, randomized, paired-eye study.

Authors:  Bojan Pajic; Iraklis Vastardis; Brigitte Pajic-Eggspuehler; Zisis Gatzioufas; Farhad Hafezi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-22

10.  Femtosecond lasers for laser in situ keratomileusis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anne Huhtala; Juhani Pietilä; Petri Mäkinen; Hannu Uusitalo
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.