Literature DB >> 25349799

Clinical study of customized aspherical intraocular lens implants.

Lie-Xi Jia1, Zhao-Hui Li1.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare if there is an improvement in visual functions with age-related cataracts between patients receiving a aspherical intraocular lens (IOL) based on corneal wavefront aberration and patients randomly assigned lenses.
METHODS: A total of 124 eyes of 124 patients with age-related cataracts were placed in experimental group and a group receiving randomly assigned (RA) lenses. The experimental group was undergone Pentacam corneal spherical aberration measurement before surgery; the targeted range for residual total spherical aberration after surgery was set to 0-0.3 µm. Patients with a corneal spherical aberration <0.3 µm were implanted with a zero-spherical aberration advanced optics (AO) aspherical IOL and patients with an aberration ≥0.3 µm received a Tecnis Z9003 aspherical lens in experimental group. RA patients were randomly implanted with an AO lens or a Tecnis Z9003 lens. Three months after surgery total spherical aberration, photopic/mesopic contrast sensitivities, photopic/mesopic with glare contrast sensitivities, and logMAR vision were measured.
RESULTS: Statistical analysis on logMAR vision showed no significant difference between two groups (P=0.413). The post-surgical total spherical aberration was 0.126±0.097 µm and 0.152±0.151 µm in the experimental and RA groups, respectively (P=0.12). The mesopic contrast sensitivities at spatial frequencies of 6, 12 and 18 c/d in the experimental group were significantly higher than of the RA group (P=0.00; P=0.04; P=0.02). The mesopic with glare contrast sensitivity in the experimental group at a spatial frequency of 18 c/d was also significantly higher vs the RA group (P=0.01).
CONCLUSION: Pre-surgical corneal spherical aberration measurement in cataract patients followed by customized selection of aspherical IOL implants improved mesopic contrast sensitivities at high spatial frequencies, and thus is a superior strategy compared to the random selection of aspherical IOL implants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cataract extraction; corneal wavefront aberration; intraocular lens; mesopic vision; night vision

Year:  2014        PMID: 25349799      PMCID: PMC4206887          DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.05.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  20 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing higher-order aberrations with intraocular lens technology.

Authors:  Roberto Bellucci; Simonetta Morselli
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 2.  Analysis of the possible benefits of aspheric intraocular lenses: review of the literature.

Authors:  Robert Montés-Micó; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; Alejandro Cerviño
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Contrast sensitivity evaluation of aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses 2 years after implantation.

Authors:  Aldo Caporossi; Fabrizio Casprini; Gianluca Martone; Angelo Balestrazzi; Gian Marco Tosi; Leonardo Ciompi
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Measurement of corneal aberrations for customisation of intraocular lens asphericity: impact on quality of vision after micro-incision cataract surgery.

Authors:  Yannick Nochez; Anne Favard; Samuel Majzoub; Pierre-Jean Pisella
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Outcomes of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia.

Authors:  Nancy J Keir; Trefford Simpson; Natalie Hutchings; Lyndon Jones; Desmond Fonn
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Effect of residual ocular spherical aberration on objective and subjective quality of vision in pseudophakic eyes.

Authors:  Yannick Nochez; Samuel Majzoub; Pierre-Jean Pisella
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Optical quality in eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses assessed by NIDEK OPD-Scan: a randomized, bilateral, clinical trial.

Authors:  Marcony R Santhiago; Marcelo V Netto; Jackson Barreto; Beatriz A F Gomes; Cristiane D Oliveira; Newton Kara-Junior
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Corneal aberrations and visual acuity after laser in situ keratomileusis: femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome.

Authors:  Ramón Calvo; Jay W McLaren; David O Hodge; William M Bourne; Sanjay V Patel
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  [Distribution of human anterior corneal spherical aberration and its related factors].

Authors:  Nü-xia Tong; Yun-e Zhao; Qin-mei Wang; Xing-yu Li
Journal:  Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2007-08

10.  Long-term comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis: mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser flap creation.

Authors:  Gonzalo Muñoz; César Albarrán-Diego; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; Santiago García-Lázaro; Alejandro Cerviño-Expósito
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.351

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of visual quality of spherical and aspherical intraocular lenses by Optical Quality Analysis System.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Xue Wang; Chuan-Di Zhou; Qiang Wu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 2.  Personalized aspheric intraocular lens implantation based on corneal spherical aberration: a review.

Authors:  Wei Du; Wei Lou; Qiang Wu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Effect of Spherical Aberration on the Optical Quality after Implantation of Two Different Aspherical Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Michael Lasta; Kata Miháltz; Illés Kovács; Pia Veronika Vécsei-Marlovits
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.909

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.