Literature DB >> 23389552

Comparison of corneal sensitivity between FS-LASIK and femtosecond lenticule extraction (ReLEx flex) or small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx smile) for myopic eyes.

Shengsheng Wei1, Yan Wang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the effect on corneal sensitivity between femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and femtosecond lenticule extraction (ReLEx flex) or FS-LASIK and small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx smile) surgery.
METHODS: Twenty-seven subjects (54 eyes) underwent FS-LASIK, 22 subjects (40 eyes) underwent ReLEx flex, and 32 subjects (61 eyes) underwent ReLEx smile surgery. Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometry (Luneau Ophthalmologie Chartres, Cedex, France) was used to evaluate corneal sensitivity preoperatively as well as at 1 week and 1 and 3 months after surgery.
RESULTS: At 1 week, central, superior, nasal, and temporal corneal sensitivity in the ReLEx flex group was significantly higher than in the FS-LASIK group (P=0.007, 0.004, 0.020, 0.004 respectively) and in the central and inferior areas at 3 months (P=0.002, 0.009 respectively). A higher corneal sensitivity after ReLEx smile surgery was observed in every quadrant at 1 week and 1 and 3 months compared with FS-LASIK surgery (P<0.01). Furthermore, in the ReLEx smile group, there were no statistical differences in the superior and temporal quadrants at 1 month postoperatively compared with preoperatively (5.19 ± 0.61 cm, P=0.198 and 5.64 ± 0.48 cm, P=0.330 respectively) and no significant differences in any quadrant at 3 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative corneal sensitivity was not remarkably changed after ReLEx smile surgery compared with FS-LASIK. This might be because ReLEx is a flapless procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23389552     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-013-2272-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  23 in total

1.  Recovery of corneal sensation after myopic correction by laser in situ keratomileusis with a nasal or superior hinge.

Authors:  Yuji Kumano; Hiroyasu Matsui; Ikuko Zushi; Asami Mawatari; Takao Matsui; Teruo Nishida; Miho Miyazaki
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 2.  Alternative applications of the femtosecond laser in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Ginny Kullman; Roberto Pineda
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 1.975

3.  Results of small incision lenticule extraction: All-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery.

Authors:  Rupal Shah; Samir Shah; Sayantan Sengupta
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Corneal reinnervation after LASIK: prospective 3-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  Martha P Calvillo; Jay W McLaren; David O Hodge; William M Bourne
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Effect of myopic LASIK on human corneal sensitivity.

Authors:  Belquiz A Nassaralla; Stephen D McLeod; João J Nassaralla
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Structural-functional correlations of corneal innervation after LASIK and penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Oliver Stachs; Andrey Zhivov; Robert Kraak; Marine Hovakimyan; Andreas Wree; Rudolf Guthoff
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective study.

Authors:  Walter Sekundo; Kathleen S Kunert; Marcus Blum
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Effect of thin femtosecond LASIK flaps on corneal sensitivity and tear function.

Authors:  Irina S Barequet; Ami Hirsh; Samuel Levinger
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Effect of hinge width on corneal sensation and dry eye after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Eric D Donnenfeld; Michael Ehrenhaus; Renée Solomon; Jeremy Mazurek; Joshua C Rozell; Henry D Perry
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Reproducibility of flap thickness with IntraLase FS and Moria LSK-1 and M2 microkeratomes.

Authors:  Jonathan H Talamo; Jeremy Meltzer; John Gardner
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  26 in total

1.  Small-incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond lenticule extraction for myopic: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jia-Song Wang; Hua-Tao Xie; Ye Jia; Ming-Chang Zhang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Dry eye and corneal sensitivity after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wen-Ting Cai; Qing-Yu Liu; Cheng-Da Ren; Qing-Quan Wei; Jun-Ling Liu; Qian-Yi Wang; Ya-Ru Du; Meng-Mei He; Jing Yu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Clinical outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huan Yan; Li-Yan Gong; Wei Huang; Yan-Li Peng
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Dry eye evaluation and correlation analysis between tear film stability and corneal surface regularity after small incision lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Yan Wang
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Subbasal nerve morphology, corneal sensation, and tear film evaluation after refractive femtosecond laser lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Anders H Vestergaard; Keea T Grønbech; Jakob Grauslund; Anders R Ivarsen; Jesper Ø Hjortdal
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  One-year refractive results, contrast sensitivity, high-order aberrations and complications after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx SMILE).

Authors:  Walter Sekundo; Jana Gertnere; Thomas Bertelmann; Igor Solomatin
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  The Correlation Analysis between Corneal Biomechanical Properties and the Surgically Induced Corneal High-Order Aberrations after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser In Situ Keratomileusis.

Authors:  Wenjing Wu; Yan Wang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Comparison of dry eye and corneal sensitivity between small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond LASIK for myopia.

Authors:  Meiyan Li; Jing Zhao; Yang Shen; Tao Li; Li He; Hailin Xu; Yongfu Yu; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) history, fundamentals of a new refractive surgery technique and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Timothy J Archer; Marine Gobbe
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2014-10-16

10.  Confocal comparison of corneal reinnervation after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).

Authors:  Meiyan Li; Lingling Niu; Bing Qin; Zimei Zhou; Katherine Ni; Qihua Le; Jun Xiang; Anji Wei; Weiping Ma; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.