Literature DB >> 2099199

Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.

J A Kluytmans1, A H van der Willigen, B Y van Heyst, W I van der Meyden, E Stolz, J H Wagenvoort.   

Abstract

Chlamydiazyme (Abbott), an enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA), was evaluated using cell culture on Hela 229 cells as the method of reference. Samples were acquired from 611 female and 280 male patients attending the outpatient clinic for sexually transmitted disease at the University Hospital in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. The prevalences of chlamydia culture-positive female and male patients were 7.8% and 14.4% respectively. The overall sensitivity and specificity values of the EIA were respectively 68.1% and 95.8% in the female and 92.1% and 92.0% in the male population. Samples which were culture-negative but EIA-positive were re-examined by a second direct test (IDEA; Boots Celltech). If the samples from 12 females and 11 males which were negative on culture but positive with both direct tests are considered as failures of cell culture, the sensitivity of the EIA in females almost equalled cell culture (74.6% versus 79.9%) and in males was even higher (93.9% versus 77.6%). Serotyping of the cultured strains revealed that all serovars of Chlamydia trachomatis occurring in this study could be detected by the EIA. The EIA offers a relatively simple and rapid test for diagnosis of C. trachomatis infections in high-risk populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2099199     DOI: 10.1177/095646249000100112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J STD AIDS        ISSN: 0956-4624            Impact factor:   1.359


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of the microparticle enzyme immunoassay Abbott IMx Select Chlamydia and the importance of urethral site sampling to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in women.

Authors:  M K Brokenshire; P J Say; A H van Vonno; C Wong
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1997-12

Review 2.  Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  C M Black
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Evaluation of Clearview and Magic Lite tests, polymerase chain reaction, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.

Authors:  J A Kluytmans; W H Goessens; J W Mouton; J H van Rijsoort-Vos; H G Niesters; W G Quint; L Habbema; E Stolz; J H Wagenvoort
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Performance of a nonisotopic DNA probe for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.

Authors:  J A Kluytmans; H G Niesters; J W Mouton; W G Quint; J A Ijpelaar; J H Van Rijsoort-Vos; L Habbema; E Stolz; M F Michel; J H Wagenvoort
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparative evaluation of detection assays for Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  R Warren; B Dwyer; M Plackett; K Pettit; N Rizvi; A M Baker
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.948

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.