PURPOSE: Anti-1-amino-2-[(18)F]fluorocyclopentane-1-carboxylic acid (anti-2-[(18)F]FACPC) is an unnatural alicyclic amino acid radiotracer with high uptake in the DU-145 prostate cancer cell line in vitro. Our goal was to determine if anti-2-[(18)F]FACPC is useful in the detection of prostate carcinoma. PROCEDURES: Five patients with elevated PSA (1.1-20.5 ng/mL) after curative therapy for prostate carcinoma underwent 60 min dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) of the pelvis after IV injection of 193-340 MBq of anti-2-[(18)F]FACPC. Uptake was compared against PET scans in the same patients with the leucine analog, anti-1-amino-3-[(18)F]fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid (anti-[(18)F]FACBC), at similar time points and validated via pathology, clinical, and imaging follow-up. RESULTS: At 5 min, average (±SD) SUVmax of malignant lesions is 4.1(±1.3) for anti-2-[(18)F] FACPC and 4.3(±1.1) for anti-[(18)F]FACBC. Yet, blood pool activity at 5 min is significantly higher for anti-2-[(18)F]FACPC with average (±SD) lesion/blood pool SUVmax/SUVmean ratio of 1.4 (±0.5) vs. 3.0 (±0.9) for anti-[(18)F]FACBC. At 20 min, average (±SD) SUVmax of malignant lesions is 2.6 (±1.0) for anti-2-[(18)F]FACPC and 3.4 (±0.8) for anti-[(18)F]FACBC. Yet, bladder activity at 20 min is significantly more intense for anti-2-[(18)F] FACPC with average (±SD) lesion/bladder SUVmax/SUVmean ratio of 0.3 (±0.8) vs. 2.3 (±1.4) for anti-[(18)F]FACBC. CONCLUSIONS: While prostate bed lesions are visible on early imaging with anti-2-[(18)F]FACPC, there is high blood pool activity obscuring nodes. As blood pool fades, nodal uptake decreases and high bladder activity then obscures pelvic structures. Compared with anti-[(18)F]FACBC, imaging characteristics for anti-2-[(18)F]FACPC are unfavorable for pelvic recurrent prostate carcinoma detection.
PURPOSE:Anti-1-amino-2-[(18)F]fluorocyclopentane-1-carboxylic acid (anti-2-[(18)F]FACPC) is an unnatural alicyclic amino acid radiotracer with high uptake in the DU-145prostate cancer cell line in vitro. Our goal was to determine if anti-2-[(18)F]FACPC is useful in the detection of prostate carcinoma. PROCEDURES: Five patients with elevated PSA (1.1-20.5 ng/mL) after curative therapy for prostate carcinoma underwent 60 min dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) of the pelvis after IV injection of 193-340 MBq of anti-2-[(18)F]FACPC. Uptake was compared against PET scans in the same patients with the leucine analog, anti-1-amino-3-[(18)F]fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid (anti-[(18)F]FACBC), at similar time points and validated via pathology, clinical, and imaging follow-up. RESULTS: At 5 min, average (±SD) SUVmax of malignant lesions is 4.1(±1.3) for anti-2-[(18)F] FACPC and 4.3(±1.1) for anti-[(18)F]FACBC. Yet, blood pool activity at 5 min is significantly higher for anti-2-[(18)F]FACPC with average (±SD) lesion/blood pool SUVmax/SUVmean ratio of 1.4 (±0.5) vs. 3.0 (±0.9) for anti-[(18)F]FACBC. At 20 min, average (±SD) SUVmax of malignant lesions is 2.6 (±1.0) for anti-2-[(18)F]FACPC and 3.4 (±0.8) for anti-[(18)F]FACBC. Yet, bladder activity at 20 min is significantly more intense for anti-2-[(18)F] FACPC with average (±SD) lesion/bladder SUVmax/SUVmean ratio of 0.3 (±0.8) vs. 2.3 (±1.4) for anti-[(18)F]FACBC. CONCLUSIONS: While prostate bed lesions are visible on early imaging with anti-2-[(18)F]FACPC, there is high blood pool activity obscuring nodes. As blood pool fades, nodal uptake decreases and high bladder activity then obscures pelvic structures. Compared with anti-[(18)F]FACBC, imaging characteristics for anti-2-[(18)F]FACPC are unfavorable for pelvic recurrent prostate carcinoma detection.
Authors: David M Schuster; John R Votaw; Peter T Nieh; Weiping Yu; Jonathon A Nye; Viraj Master; F DuBois Bowman; Muta M Issa; Mark M Goodman Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: James Mohler; Robert R Bahnson; Barry Boston; J Erik Busby; Anthony D'Amico; James A Eastham; Charles A Enke; Daniel George; Eric Mark Horwitz; Robert P Huben; Philip Kantoff; Mark Kawachi; Michael Kuettel; Paul H Lange; Gary Macvicar; Elizabeth R Plimack; Julio M Pow-Sang; Mack Roach; Eric Rohren; Bruce J Roth; Dennis C Shrieve; Matthew R Smith; Sandy Srinivas; Przemyslaw Twardowski; Patrick C Walsh Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: K F Hübner; G A Andrews; L Washburn; B W Wieland; W D Gibbs; R L Hayes; T A Butler; J D Winebrenner Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1977-12 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Bital Savir-Baruch; David M Schuster; Nashwa Jarkas; Viraj A Master; Peter T Nieh; Raghuveer K Halkar; Jonathon A Nye; Melinda M Lewis; Ronald J Crowe; Ronald J Voll; Vernon M Camp; Leah M Bellamy; David L Roberts; Mark M Goodman Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Thomas C Pickel; Gouthami Pashikanti; Ronald J Voll; Weiping Yu; Zhaobin Zhang; Jonathon A Nye; John Bacsa; Jeffrey J Olson; Lanny S Liebeskind; Mark M Goodman Journal: ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci Date: 2021-04-05