Literature DB >> 20972834

In vitro measurements of flow using multislice computed tomography (MSCT).

Klaus Lackner1, Henning Bovenschulte, Hartmut Stützer, Thomas Just, Hassan Al-Hassani, Barbara Krug.   

Abstract

To examine in vitro whether an assessment of flow in normal and obstructed vessels is essentially possible using modern multislice CT-scanners. An experimental model allowed known stenoses to be perfused at defined flow rates. Aorta and coronary arteries were simulated by silicone tubes. A pulsatile pump was used to perfuse water through the system with intermittent injection of a bolus of radio-opaque contrast agent. CT-measurements were carried out with slice orientation perpendicular to the tubes. 50-90% concentric stenoses were examined 5 times at 4 different stenosis slice distances. A mathematical algorithm calculated the temporal density changes within a ROI in the tube cross-sections. Quantitative assessment of the data simultaneously acquired with the 16-slice system for the "coronary" and "aortal" time-density curves showed that the model allowed for exclusion of a ≥ 80% stenosis grade with a 99% probability when the slopes of the density increase quotient was > 0.79; a stenosis grade of ≥ 90% could be excluded when the slopes of the density increase quotient was > 0.52. A Quotient > 0.94 for "peak density" was associated with a 99% probability of a stenosis grade ≥ 70%. The 64-slice system allowed stenosis grades of ≥ 80% to be discriminated from lower grades. The general feasibility of the in vitro approach was verified in an in vivo model. The spatial, contrast and temporal resolution of CT scanners with at least 16 detector rows enables qualitative and semiquantitative assessment of stenotic changes in flow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20972834     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-010-9728-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  15 in total

1.  Myocardial blood flow estimated by synchronous, multislice, high-speed computed tomography.

Authors:  T Wang; X Wu; N Chung; E L Ritman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography: a scientific statement from the american heart association committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention of the council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and the councils on clinical cardiology and cardiovascular disease in the young.

Authors:  David A Bluemke; Stephan Achenbach; Matthew Budoff; Thomas C Gerber; Bernard Gersh; L David Hillis; W Gregory Hundley; Warren J Manning; Beth Feller Printz; Matthias Stuber; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Does coronary flow trump coronary anatomy?

Authors:  K Lance Gould
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-08

4.  Measurement of myocardial blood flow by ultrafast computed tomography.

Authors:  C J Wolfkiel; J L Ferguson; E V Chomka; W R Law; I N Labin; M L Tenzer; M Booker; B H Brundage
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Tissue mean transit time from dynamic computed tomography by a simple deconvolution technique.

Authors:  L Axel
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Validation of minimally invasive measurement of myocardial perfusion using electron beam computed tomography and application in human volunteers.

Authors:  M R Bell; L O Lerman; J A Rumberger
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Low to intermediate probability of coronary artery disease: comparison of coronary CT angiography with first-pass MR myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Jan G J Groothuis; Aernout M Beek; Stijn L Brinckman; Martijn R Meijerink; Simon C Koestner; Robin Nijveldt; Marco J W Götte; Mark B M Hofman; Cornelis van Kuijk; Albert C van Rossum
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Use of ultrafast computed tomography to quantitate regional myocardial perfusion: a preliminary report.

Authors:  J A Rumberger; A J Feiring; M J Lipton; C B Higgins; S R Ell; M L Marcus
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT.

Authors:  Julie M Miller; Carlos E Rochitte; Marc Dewey; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Hiroyuki Niinuma; Ilan Gottlieb; Narinder Paul; Melvin E Clouse; Edward P Shapiro; John Hoe; Albert C Lardo; David E Bush; Albert de Roos; Christopher Cox; Jeffery Brinker; João A C Lima
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Functional assessment of coronary artery flow using adenosine stress dual-energy CT: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Michinobu Nagao; Teruhito Kido; Kouki Watanabe; Hideyuki Saeki; Hideki Okayama; Akira Kurata; Kohei Hosokawa; Hiroshi Higashino; Teruhito Mochizuki
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.357

View more
  8 in total

1.  From stenosis imaging to functional imaging: a new horizon of coronary computed tomography.

Authors:  Jin-Ho Choi; Yeon Hyeon Choe; James K Min
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Additional value of transluminal attenuation gradient in CT angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Wynand J Stuijfzand; Ibrahim Danad; Pieter G Raijmakers; C Bogdan Marcu; Martijn W Heymans; Cornelis C van Kuijk; Albert C van Rossum; Koen Nieman; James K Min; Jonathon Leipsic; Niels van Royen; Paul Knaapen
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-03-13

3.  Patterns of Opacification in Coronary CT Angiography: Contrast Differences and Gradients.

Authors:  Frank J Rybicki; Yu-Hsiang Juan; Sachin S Saboo; Elizabeth George; Rani Bhivasankar; Dimitrios Mitsouras
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2014-10-01

4.  Prediction of degree of carotid stenosis with the transluminal attenuation difference ratio.

Authors:  Ayşegül Gürsoy Çoruh; Elif Peker; Başak Gülpınar; Mine Hayriye Sorgun; Atilla Halil Elhan; Ömer Suat Fitoz
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  Transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary computed tomography angiography for determining stenosis severity of calcified coronary artery: a primary study with dual-source CT.

Authors:  Minwen Zheng; Mengqi Wei; Didi Wen; Hongliang Zhao; Ying Liu; Jiayi Li; Jian Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Accuracy and reproducibility of automated, standardized coronary transluminal attenuation gradient measurements.

Authors:  Yiannis S Chatzizisis; Elizabeth George; Tianrun Cai; Urvi P Fulwadhva; Kanako K Kumamaru; Kurt Schultz; Yasuko Fujisawa; Carlos Rassi; Michael Steigner; Richard T Mather; Ron Blankstein; Frank J Rybicki; Dimitrios Mitsouras
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 7.  Cardiovascular imaging 2011 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Ricardo A Costa; Hiram G Bezerra; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Is the diagnostic radiological image an underutilised resource? Exploring the literature.

Authors:  William A S Cox; Penelope Cavenagh; Fernando Bello
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2019-02-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.