Literature DB >> 9817137

Differential item functioning in the Danish translation of the SF-36.

J B Bjorner1, S Kreiner, J E Ware, M T Damsgaard, P Bech.   

Abstract

Statistical analyses of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) can be used for rigorous translation evaluations. DIF techniques test whether each item functions in the same way, irrespective of the country, language, or culture of the respondents. For a given level of health, the score on any item should be independent of nationality. This requirement can be tested through contingency-table methods, which are efficient for analyzing all types of items. We investigated DIF in the Danish translation of the SF-36 Health Survey, using two general population samples (USA, n = 1,506; Denmark, n = 3,950). DIF was identified for 12 out of 35 items. These results agreed with independent ratings of translation quality, but the statistical techniques were more sensitive. When included in scales, the items exhibiting DIF had only a little impact on conclusions about cross-national differences in health in the general population. However, if used as single items, the DIF items could seriously bias results from cross-national comparisons. Also, the DIF items might have larger impact on cross-national comparison of groups with poorer health status. We conclude that analysis of DIF is useful for evaluating questionnaire translations.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9817137     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00111-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  70 in total

1.  Use of differential item functioning analysis to assess the equivalence of translations of a questionnaire.

Authors:  Morten Aa Petersen; Mogens Groenvold; Jakob B Bjorner; Neil Aaronson; Thierry Conroy; Ann Cull; Peter Fayers; Marianne Hjermstad; Mirjam Sprangers; Marianne Sullivan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria.

Authors:  Neil Aaronson; Jordi Alonso; Audrey Burnam; Kathleen N Lohr; Donald L Patrick; Edward Perrin; Ruth E Stein
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Is there an association between rumination and self-reported physical health? A one-year follow-up in a young and an elderly sample.

Authors:  Dorthe Kirkegaard Thomsen; Mimi Yung Mehlsen; Frede Olesen; Marianne Hokland; Andrus Viidik; Kirsten Avlund; Robert Zachariae
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2004-06

4.  Occurrences and sources of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) in patient-reported outcome measures: Description of DIF methods, and review of measures of depression, quality of life and general health.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Mildred Ramirez; Jin-Shei Lai; Stephanie Silver
Journal:  Psychol Sci Q       Date:  2008

5.  Is the standard SF-12 health survey valid and equivalent for a Chinese population?

Authors:  Cindy L K Lam; Eileen Y Y Tse; Barbara Gandek
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Are factor analytical techniques used appropriately in the validation of health status questionnaires? A systematic review on the quality of factor analysis of the SF-36.

Authors:  Henrica C W de Vet; Herman J Adèr; Caroline B Terwee; François Pouwer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Rapid detection of differential item functioning in assessments of health-related quality of life: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Paul K Crane; Laura E Gibbons; Kaavya Narasimhalu; Jin-Shei Lai; David Cella
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  The use of differential item functioning analyses to identify cultural differences in responses to the EORTC QLQ-C30.

Authors:  N W Scott; P M Fayers; N K Aaronson; A Bottomley; A de Graeff; M Groenvold; M Koller; M A Petersen; M A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Development of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for the EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning dimension.

Authors:  Morten Aa Petersen; Mogens Groenvold; Neil K Aaronson; Wei-Chu Chie; Thierry Conroy; Anna Costantini; Peter Fayers; Jorunn Helbostad; Bernhard Holzner; Stein Kaasa; Susanne Singer; Galina Velikova; Teresa Young
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Testing whether patients with diabetes and healthy people perceive the meaning of the items in the Persian version of the SF-36 questionnaire similarly: a differential item functioning analysis.

Authors:  Zahra Bagheri; Peyman Jafari; Marzieh Mahmoodi; Mohammad Hossein Dabbaghmanesh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.