Literature DB >> 20972626

Computational hemodynamics in cerebral aneurysms: the effects of modeled versus measured boundary conditions.

Alberto Marzo1, Pankaj Singh, Ignacio Larrabide, Alessandro Radaelli, Stuart Coley, Matt Gwilliam, Iain D Wilkinson, Patricia Lawford, Philippe Reymond, Umang Patel, Alejandro Frangi, D Rod Hose.   

Abstract

Modeling of flow in intracranial aneurysms (IAs) requires flow information at the model boundaries. In absence of patient-specific measurements, typical or modeled boundary conditions (BCs) are often used. This study investigates the effects of modeled versus patient-specific BCs on modeled hemodynamics within IAs. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models of five IAs were reconstructed from three-dimensional rotational angiography (3DRA). BCs were applied using in turn patient-specific phase-contrast-MR (pc-MR) measurements, a 1D-circulation model, and a physiologically coherent method based on local WSS at inlets. The Navier-Stokes equations were solved using the Ansys®-CFX™ software. Wall shear stress (WSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), and other hemodynamic indices were computed. Differences in the values obtained with the three methods were analyzed using boxplot diagrams. Qualitative similarities were observed in the flow fields obtained with the three approaches. The quantitative comparison showed smaller discrepancies between pc-MR and 1D-model data, than those observed between pc-MR and WSS-scaled data. Discrepancies were reduced when indices were normalized to mean hemodynamic aneurysmal data. The strong similarities observed for the three BCs models suggest that vessel and aneurysm geometry have the strongest influence on aneurysmal hemodynamics. In absence of patient-specific BCs, a distributed circulation model may represent the best option when CFD is used for large cohort studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20972626     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-010-0187-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  21 in total

1.  A non-dimensional parameter for classification of the flow in intracranial aneurysms. II. Patient-specific geometries.

Authors:  Hafez Asgharzadeh; Hossein Asadi; Hui Meng; Iman Borazjani
Journal:  Phys Fluids (1994)       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.521

2.  Analysis of Inlet Velocity Profiles in Numerical Assessment of Fontan Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Zhenglun Alan Wei; Connor Huddleston; Phillip M Trusty; Shelly Singh-Gryzbon; Mark A Fogel; Alessandro Veneziani; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Generalized versus patient-specific inflow boundary conditions in computational fluid dynamics simulations of cerebral aneurysmal hemodynamics.

Authors:  I G H Jansen; J J Schneiders; W V Potters; P van Ooij; R van den Berg; E van Bavel; H A Marquering; C B L M Majoie
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Toward improving fidelity of computational fluid dynamics simulations: boundary conditions matter.

Authors:  Christof Karmonik
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  A data-driven approach for addressing the lack of flow waveform data in studies of cerebral arterial flow in older adults.

Authors:  Michael J Durka; Isaac H Wong; David F Kallmes; Dario Pasalic; Fernando Mut; Manoj Jagani; Pablo J Blanco; Juan R Cebral; Anne M Robertson
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.833

6.  Evaluation of magnetic resonance angiography as a possible alternative to rotational angiography or computed tomography angiography for assessing cerebrovascular computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Yuya Yoneyama; Haruo Isoda; Kenta Ishiguro; Masaki Terada; Masaki Kamiya; Kenichi Otsubo; Roshani Perera; Takashi Mizuno; Atsushi Fukuyama; Kazuya Takiguchi; Tomoya Watanabe; Takafumi Kosugi; Yoshiaki Komori; Shinji Naganawa
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2020-10-12

7.  Better Than Nothing: A Rational Approach for Minimizing the Impact of Outflow Strategy on Cerebrovascular Simulations.

Authors:  C Chnafa; O Brina; V M Pereira; D A Steinman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  Physical factors effecting cerebral aneurysm pathophysiology.

Authors:  Chander Sadasivan; David J Fiorella; Henry H Woo; Baruch B Lieber
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 9.  Generic and patient-specific models of the arterial tree.

Authors:  Philippe Reymond; Orestis Vardoulis; Nikos Stergiopulos
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 2.502

10.  Cerebral aneurysms treated with flow-diverting stents: computational models with intravascular blood flow measurements.

Authors:  M R Levitt; P M McGah; A Aliseda; P D Mourad; J D Nerva; S S Vaidya; R P Morton; B V Ghodke; L J Kim
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.