OBJECTIVES: To better understand aging women's experience with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms and the care they receive, with the ultimate goal of improving the quality of care provided to aging women with overactive bladder. METHODS: Women seen in outpatient female urology clinics were identified by ICD-9 codes for OAB and recruited. Patients with painful bladder syndrome, mixed stress and urge incontinence, prolapse, or recent pelvic surgery were excluded. Patient focus groups were conducted by trained nonclinician moderators incorporating topics related to patients' perceptions of OAB physiology, symptoms, diagnostic evaluation, treatments, and outcomes. Qualitative data analysis was performed using grounded theory methodology. RESULTS: Five focus groups totaling 33 women with OAB were conducted. Average patient age was 67 years (range, 39-91). Older women with OAB lacked knowledge about the physiology of their disease and had poor understanding regarding the rationale for many diagnostic tests, including urodynamics and cystoscopy. The results of diagnostic studies often were not understood by older patients. Many women were dissatisfied with the care they had received. This lack of knowledge and understanding was more apparent among the elderly women in the group. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrated a poor understanding of the physiology of overactive bladder and the rationale for various diagnostic modalities and treatments. This was associated with dissatisfaction with care. There is a need for better communication with older women experiencing OAB symptoms about the physiology of the condition. Copyright Â
OBJECTIVES: To better understand aging women's experience with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms and the care they receive, with the ultimate goal of improving the quality of care provided to aging women with overactive bladder. METHODS: Women seen in outpatient female urology clinics were identified by ICD-9 codes for OAB and recruited. Patients with painful bladder syndrome, mixed stress and urge incontinence, prolapse, or recent pelvic surgery were excluded. Patient focus groups were conducted by trained nonclinician moderators incorporating topics related to patients' perceptions of OAB physiology, symptoms, diagnostic evaluation, treatments, and outcomes. Qualitative data analysis was performed using grounded theory methodology. RESULTS: Five focus groups totaling 33 women with OAB were conducted. Average patient age was 67 years (range, 39-91). Older women with OAB lacked knowledge about the physiology of their disease and had poor understanding regarding the rationale for many diagnostic tests, including urodynamics and cystoscopy. The results of diagnostic studies often were not understood by older patients. Many women were dissatisfied with the care they had received. This lack of knowledge and understanding was more apparent among the elderly women in the group. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrated a poor understanding of the physiology of overactive bladder and the rationale for various diagnostic modalities and treatments. This was associated with dissatisfaction with care. There is a need for better communication with older women experiencing OAB symptoms about the physiology of the condition. Copyright Â
Authors: Paul Abrams; Linda Cardozo; Magnus Fall; Derek Griffiths; Peter Rosier; Ulf Ulmsten; Philip van Kerrebroeck; Arne Victor; Alan Wein Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2002 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Ingrid Nygaard; Matthew D Barber; Kathryn L Burgio; Kimberly Kenton; Susan Meikle; Joseph Schaffer; Cathie Spino; William E Whitehead; Jennifer Wu; Debra J Brody Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-09-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Gregory Kanter; Katherine A Volpe; Gena C Dunivan; Sara B Cichowski; Peter C Jeppson; Rebecca G Rogers; Yuko M Komesu Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Lisa Kane Low; Beverly Rosa Williams; Deepa R Camenga; Jeni Hebert-Beirne; Sonya S Brady; Diane K Newman; Aimee S James; Cecilia T Hardacker; Jesse Nodora; Sarah E Linke; Kathryn L Burgio Journal: J Adv Nurs Date: 2019-07-09 Impact factor: 3.187
Authors: Jennifer T Anger; Thuy X Le; Helen A Nissim; Lisa Rogo-Gupta; Rezoana Rashid; Ajay Behniwal; Ariana L Smith; Mark S Litwin; Larissa V Rodriguez; Alan J Wein; Sally L Maliski Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-09-19 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Alexis M Tran; Peter K Sand; Miriam J Seitz; Adam Gafni-Kane; Ying Zhou; Sylvia M Botros Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Cecilia K Wieslander; Alexandriah Alas; Gena C Dunivan; Claudia Sevilla; Sara Cichowski; Sally Maliski; Karyn Eilber; Rebecca G Rogers; Jennifer T Anger Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Claudia Sevilla; Cecilia K Wieslander; Alexandriah N Alas; Gena C Dunivan; Aqsa A Khan; Sally L Maliski; Rebecca G Rogers; Jennifer Tash Anger Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2013 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.091
Authors: Vik Khullar; Daniela Marschall-Kehrel; Montserrat Espuna-Pons; Con J Kelleher; Shannon E Tully; Elisabeth C Piault; Linda Brubaker; Aino Fianu-Jonasson; David Weinstein; Agneta Bergqvist; Marion Kvasz Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2013-04-09 Impact factor: 2.894