Vatche A Minassian1, Walter F Stewart, G Craig Wood. 1. Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania 17822, USA. vaminassian@geisinger.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To understand variation in prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) and risk factors, given different definitions. METHODS: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001-2002 data on UI were used. Prevalence, severity, and associated risk factors of stress, urge, mixed, and any UI were estimated in 2,875 adult women. Severe UI was defined as incontinence a few times or more per week. Moderate UI was defined as an incontinence frequency of a few times per month only, and mild UI was defined as incontinence frequency of a few times per year only. Odds ratios for the association of potential risk factors were examined in a logistic regression model. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of stress, urge, mixed, and any UI was 23.7%, 9.9%, 14.5%, and 49.2%, respectively. Prevalence of stress UI peaked at the fifth decade. Prevalence of urge and mixed UI increased with age. The largest number of risk factors and the strongest associations were found with severe UI. Age, ethnic background, and weight were significant risk factors common to all UI severity levels. Although parity and hysterectomy were risk factors for moderate and severe UI, they were not for mild UI. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of UI varies substantially by type and case definition. The stronger associations of known risk factors with severe UI and the lack of risk factors with lesser UI severity types suggest that severe UI includes primarily clinically significant cases, whereas mild UI represents transient or nonpathologic states that may not be clinically significant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
OBJECTIVE: To understand variation in prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) and risk factors, given different definitions. METHODS: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001-2002 data on UI were used. Prevalence, severity, and associated risk factors of stress, urge, mixed, and any UI were estimated in 2,875 adult women. Severe UI was defined as incontinence a few times or more per week. Moderate UI was defined as an incontinence frequency of a few times per month only, and mild UI was defined as incontinence frequency of a few times per year only. Odds ratios for the association of potential risk factors were examined in a logistic regression model. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of stress, urge, mixed, and any UI was 23.7%, 9.9%, 14.5%, and 49.2%, respectively. Prevalence of stress UI peaked at the fifth decade. Prevalence of urge and mixed UI increased with age. The largest number of risk factors and the strongest associations were found with severe UI. Age, ethnic background, and weight were significant risk factors common to all UI severity levels. Although parity and hysterectomy were risk factors for moderate and severe UI, they were not for mild UI. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of UI varies substantially by type and case definition. The stronger associations of known risk factors with severe UI and the lack of risk factors with lesser UI severity types suggest that severe UI includes primarily clinically significant cases, whereas mild UI represents transient or nonpathologic states that may not be clinically significant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Authors: Kevin Hawkins; Janet Pernarelli; Ronald J Ozminkowski; Ming Bai; Stephanie J Gaston; Cynthia Hommer; Richard J Migliori; Charlotte S Yeh Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2010-12-08 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Linda Brubaker; Emily S Lukacz; Kathryn Burgio; Philippe Zimmern; Peggy Norton; Wendy Leng; Harry Johnson; Stephen Kraus; Anne Stoddard Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Renea M Sturm; Benjamin N Breyer; Chin-Shang Li; Leslee L Subak; Jeannete S Brown; Alan W Shindel Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2014-10-14 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Linda Brubaker; Anne Stoddard; Holly Richter; Philippe Zimmern; Pamela Moalli; Stephen R Kraus; Peggy Norton; Emily Lukacz; Larry Sirls; Harry Johnson Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2009 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: George A Kuchel; Nicola Moscufo; Charles R Guttmann; Neer Zeevi; Dorothy Wakefield; Julia Schmidt; Catherine E Dubeau; Leslie Wolfson Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2009-04-21 Impact factor: 6.053