Literature DB >> 20967438

In vitro evaluation of the Lithoclast Ultra Vario combination lithotrite.

Jonathan N VonDerHaar1, James A McAteer, James C Williams, James E Lingeman.   

Abstract

Rigid intracorporeal lithotrites can be invaluable in the removal of large stone burdens during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. One such device, the Lithoclast Ultra Vario (LUV) has an outer ultrasound probe and inner pneumatic-ballistic probe. The ballistic probe can be advanced or retracted and run at 1-12 Hz. Since it can be difficult to predict optimal settings with any new device, we asked if in vitro testing could give insight into how best to operate this lithotrite. We tested the LUV under hands-free conditions that simulate treatment of fixed stones and freely movable stones. A fixed-stone test system measured the time to penetrate a gypsum model stone placed atop the probe and a movable-stone system determined time for comminution of a stone within a confined space. In addition, the time to evacuate 2-mm stone particles was measured. For hands-on testing, model stones were placed in a plastic dish submerged in water and the time to comminution was measured. Penetration time of fixed stones was faster with the ballistic probe extended 2.5 mm than when retracted (5.30 ± 0.85 vs. 8.75 ± 1.07 s, p < 0.0001). Comminution of free stones was faster with the ballistic probe retracted than when it was extended 1 mm or 2.5 mm (9.7 ± 0.9, 13.8 ± 1.3, 23.7 ± 3.2 s, p < 0.0001). In hands-on testing, extending the ballistic probe substantially reduced the efficiency of comminution (36.7 ± 6.4 vs. 131.3 ± 15.3 s, p < 0.0001). Clearance of fragments was considerably faster when the pneumatic-ballistic rate was 12 Hz compared to 1 Hz (12.3 ± 1.1 vs. 28.3 ± 2.2 s, p < 0.0001). These in vitro findings suggest ways to take advantage of the positive features while minimizing potential limitations of this lithotrite. Extending the ballistic probe is an advantage when the stone is immobile, as would be the case in treating a large stone that can be isolated against the wall of the pelvicalyceal system, but is a distinct disadvantage--due to retropulsion--when the stone is free to move. Operation of the LUV at fast ballistic rate significantly improved its ability to aspirate stone fragments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20967438      PMCID: PMC5901674          DOI: 10.1007/s00240-010-0318-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  11 in total

1.  Efficiency and efficacy of different intracorporeal ultrasonic lithotripsy units on a synthetic stone model.

Authors:  E N Liatsikos; C Z Dinlenc; J D Fogarty; R Kapoor; N O Bernardo; A D Smith
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  In vitro comparison of 4 ultrasound lithotripsy devices.

Authors:  Gerald Haupt; Angela Haupt
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  In vitro assessment of ultrasonic lithotriptors.

Authors:  Ramsay L Kuo; Ryan F Paterson; Tibério M Siqueira; Andrew P Evan; James A McAteer; James C Williams; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  In vitro assessment of lithoclast ultra intracorporeal lithotripter.

Authors:  Ramsay L Kuo; Ryan F Paterson; Tibério M Siqueira; Andrew P Evan; James A McAteer; James C Williams; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Ultracal-30 gypsum artificial stones for research on the mechanisms of stone breakage in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James A McAteer; James C Williams; Robin O Cleveland; Javier Van Cauwelaert; Michael R Bailey; David A Lifshitz; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-12

6.  Maximizing stone fragmentation efficiency with ultrasonic probes: impact of probe pressure and rotation.

Authors:  David M Goldman; Renato N Pedro; Alex Kossett; Wiliam Durfee; Manoj Monga
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Clinical efficacy of a combination pneumatic and ultrasonic lithotrite.

Authors:  Paul K Pietrow; Brian K Auge; Pei Zhong; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Prospective randomized comparison of a combined ultrasonic and pneumatic lithotrite with a standard ultrasonic lithotrite for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Daniel S Lehman; Gregory W Hruby; Courtney Phillips; Ramakrishna Venkatesh; Sara Best; Manoj Monga; Jaime Landman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 9.  Surgical management of stones: new technology.

Authors:  Brian R Matlaga; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.620

10.  Use of LMA Stonebreaker as an intracorporeal lithotrite in the management of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Rajendra B Nerli; Ashish C Koura; Vikram Prabha; Gautam Kamat; S B Alur
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.