Literature DB >> 14532764

In vitro comparison of 4 ultrasound lithotripsy devices.

Gerald Haupt1, Angela Haupt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Endoscopic lithotripsy is still the method of choice for a number of stones, especially large renal stones. Various disintegration techniques exist. Ultrasound is widely used because it is the only method that allows disintegration and active suction of stone debris at the same time. We evaluated 4 ultrasound lithotriptors in vitro.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a newly developed experimental setup and compared 4 ultrasound devices, namely the 27085 K (Karl Storz Endoscopy, Tuttlingen, Germany), 2167.01 (Wolf, Knittlingen, Germany), USL 2000 (Circon Corp., Santa Barbara, California) and an ultrasound prototype lithotriptor (EMS, Nyon, Switzerland). RESULTS All ultrasound lithotriptors achieved stone disintegration, which depended on the pressure used to apply ultrasound. Newer devices with modified technology provided better disintegration.
CONCLUSIONS: All ultrasound devices are effective for lithotripsy. Changes in the ultrasound setup and integration of modern technical knowledge into ultrasound devices increase efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14532764     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000091970.31421.90

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  3 in total

1.  In vitro evaluation of the Lithoclast Ultra Vario combination lithotrite.

Authors:  Jonathan N VonDerHaar; James A McAteer; James C Williams; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-10-22

2.  New instrumentation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Joseph W Pugh; Benjamin K Canales
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-07

Review 3.  Surgical management of stones: new technology.

Authors:  Brian R Matlaga; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.620

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.