Paul F Lachiewicz1. 1. Department of Surgery, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. paul.lachiewicz@gmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Posterior-stabilized TKAs, which use a polyethylene tibial post to articulate against a metal femoral cam, are used regularly. Reported complications are related to the patellofemoral articulation or the tibial post-cam mechanism. Fracture of the tibial post is an uncommon but disabling complication after posterior-stabilized TKA that requires operative treatment. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The literature was reviewed to determine the frequency of tibial post fracture and address three questions: (1) Is there a specific prosthetic design or patient demographics in knees with a fracture of the tibial post? (2) What are the common presenting complaints and methods of diagnosis? (3) What methods of treatment have been used? METHODS: A PubMed search of English language articles from February 1982 to April 2010 was performed and 20 articles, all Level IV studies, were identified. RESULTS: One specific design of posterior-stabilized tibial post with a central screw hole had a 12.4% incidence of fracture. Tibial post fracture has been reported with other designs, but with an incidence of 1% or less. The most common presenting symptoms include effusion, instability, or patella clunk syndrome. The most common method of diagnosis was clinical examination followed by arthroscopic examination. Treatment with revision to a new tibial polyethylene liner generally has been successful at short-term followup. CONCLUSIONS: Tibial post fracture is a relatively uncommon complication after posterior-stabilized TKA that usually is treated successfully with liner exchange. The low quality of available literature makes it difficult to recommend a specific treatment protocol.
BACKGROUND: Posterior-stabilized TKAs, which use a polyethylene tibial post to articulate against a metal femoral cam, are used regularly. Reported complications are related to the patellofemoral articulation or the tibial post-cam mechanism. Fracture of the tibial post is an uncommon but disabling complication after posterior-stabilized TKA that requires operative treatment. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The literature was reviewed to determine the frequency of tibial post fracture and address three questions: (1) Is there a specific prosthetic design or patient demographics in knees with a fracture of the tibial post? (2) What are the common presenting complaints and methods of diagnosis? (3) What methods of treatment have been used? METHODS: A PubMed search of English language articles from February 1982 to April 2010 was performed and 20 articles, all Level IV studies, were identified. RESULTS: One specific design of posterior-stabilized tibial post with a central screw hole had a 12.4% incidence of fracture. Tibial post fracture has been reported with other designs, but with an incidence of 1% or less. The most common presenting symptoms include effusion, instability, or patella clunk syndrome. The most common method of diagnosis was clinical examination followed by arthroscopic examination. Treatment with revision to a new tibial polyethylene liner generally has been successful at short-term followup. CONCLUSIONS:Tibial post fracture is a relatively uncommon complication after posterior-stabilized TKA that usually is treated successfully with liner exchange. The low quality of available literature makes it difficult to recommend a specific treatment protocol.
Authors: B Sonny Bal; David Greenberg; Stephen Li; David R Mauerhan; Loren Schultz; Kenneth Cherry Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2007-11-09 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Nicholas R Paterson; Matthew G Teeter; Steven J MacDonald; Richard W McCalden; Douglas D R Naudie Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: David H Dejour; Jacobus H Müller; Mo Saffarini; Michel Timoteo; Pierre Chambat; Gerard Deschamps; Michel P Bonnin Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Clare K Fitzpatrick; Chadd W Clary; Adam J Cyr; Lorin P Maletsky; Paul J Rullkoetter Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2013-04-19 Impact factor: 3.494