Literature DB >> 20959949

[Protective ileostoma versus protective transverse stoma. What evidence is available?].

C D Klink1, S Willis, U P Neumann, M Jansen.   

Abstract

The clinical outcome of anastomotic leakage in colorectal and coloanal anastomoses necessitates a loop stoma for fecal diversion. Controversy remains of the most suitable position of the stoma. In this respect a loop ileostomy or loop colostomy can be performed. The aim of this study was to determine the advantages and disadvantages of both surgical strategies from the literature and to derive possible recommendations. Both methods provide a good operative outcome with low complication rates. Overall there is a trend towards ileostomy because of lower complication rates after stoma creation and the incidence of sepsis and stoma prolapse in particular is significantly reduced after ileostomy. Concerning stoma reversal both methods seem to be equivalent. As long as no large evidenced-based, randomized studies are available loop ileostomy seems to be the most appropriate surgical procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20959949     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-010-1930-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  9 in total

1.  Correlating the Fecal Incontinence Quality-of-Life Score and the SF-36 to a proposed Ostomy Function Index in patients with a stoma.

Authors:  Patrick Colquhoun; Roberto Kaiser; Eric G Weiss; Jonathan Efron; Anthony M Vernava; Juan J Nogueras; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  Temporary transverse colostomy vs loop ileostomy in diversion: a case-matched study.

Authors:  Y Sakai; H Nelson; D Larson; L Maidl; T Young-Fadok; D Ilstrup
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-03

3.  Temporary ileostomy versus temporary colostomy: a meta-analysis of complications.

Authors:  Panuwat Lertsithichai; Pudsaporn Rattanapichart
Journal:  Asian J Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.767

Review 4.  Comparison of outcomes following ileostomy versus colostomy for defunctioning colorectal anastomoses.

Authors:  Henry S Tilney; Parvinder S Sains; Richard E Lovegrove; George E Reese; Alexander G Heriot; Paris P Tekkis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  E Rullier; N Le Toux; C Laurent; J L Garrelon; M Parneix; J Saric
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  De-functioning stomas: a prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy.

Authors:  N S Williams; D G Nasmyth; D Jones; A H Smith
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 7.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Norbert Hüser; Christoph W Michalski; Mert Erkan; Tibor Schuster; Robert Rosenberg; Jörg Kleeff; Helmut Friess
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for fecal diversion after colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Rondelli; P Reboldi; A Rulli; F Barberini; A Guerrisi; L Izzo; A Bolognese; P Covarelli; C Boselli; C Becattini; G Noya
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Ileostomy or colostomy for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis. Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katia Ferreira Güenaga; Suzana Angélica Silva Lustosa; Sarhan Sydney Saad; Humberto Saconato; Delcio Matos
Journal:  Acta Cir Bras       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.388

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Loop ostomy following laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Xin Wu; Guole Lin; Huizhong Qiu; Yi Xiao; Bin Wu; Miner Zhong
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.175

2.  A nomogram to predict the incidence of permanent stoma in elderly patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Chuangkun Li; Xiusen Qin; Zifeng Yang; Wentai Guo; Rongkang Huang; Huaiming Wang; Hui Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.