Literature DB >> 17204828

Correlating the Fecal Incontinence Quality-of-Life Score and the SF-36 to a proposed Ostomy Function Index in patients with a stoma.

Patrick Colquhoun1, Roberto Kaiser, Eric G Weiss, Jonathan Efron, Anthony M Vernava, Juan J Nogueras, Steven D Wexner.   

Abstract

Quality of life is affected by the creation of a stoma. To assess the validity of the Ostomy Function Index in patients with a stoma, a prospective survey was conducted from July 2000 to September 2001 among patients participating in local United Ostomy Association chapters (N = 99; 55 with a colostomy and 44 with an ileostomy). The Short Form 36 general health survey, Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale, and the proposed Cleveland Clinic Florida Ostomy Function Index were used to assess general health and stoma function in patients with an ostomy. The average proposed function index score (7 = excellent function, 35 = poor function) was 11.97 (range 7 to 22). The proposed function Index correlated with the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale and the physical and mental component scales of the SF-36 (P < 0.05). The correlation between the proposed function index and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale was stronger in colostomy than in ileostomy patients. With the exception of the SF-36 role-emotional domain in ileostomy patients, the function index correlated with all SF-36 scales (P <0.05) in both patient groups. The results of this study suggest that ostomy function is variable and correlates with quality of life and that the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale offers a limited assessment of quality of life in colostomy patients. The Cleveland Clinic Florida Ostomy Function Index offers an objective assessment of ostomy function that reflects on quality of life. Additional studies to refine measurement of quality of life in stoma patients are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17204828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage        ISSN: 0889-5899            Impact factor:   2.629


  3 in total

Review 1.  [Protective ileostoma versus protective transverse stoma. What evidence is available?].

Authors:  C D Klink; S Willis; U P Neumann; M Jansen
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  A mixed-method study on the generic and ostomy-specific quality of life of cancer and non-cancer ostomy patients.

Authors:  Femke Jansen; Cornelia F van Uden-Kraan; J Annemieke Braakman; Paulina M van Keizerswaard; Birgit I Witte; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Continuing Care Bundle in Elderly Patients with Rectal Cancer after Radical Resection with Permanent Stoma.

Authors:  Pan Pan; Lei Chen; Dan Zhang; Shuang Rao; Ying Tao; Lin Fan
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.650

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.