Literature DB >> 20959366

Evaluation of flow measurement from the first pass bolus T1 weighted images using inversion recovery sequence.

M Nazarpoor1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown that the organ blood flows (OBFs) calculated using the T(1) weighted MRI technique were lower than the expected values. The aim of this study was a flow measurement comparison between the theoretical and experimental flows based on the technique before and after corrections (coil non-uniformity and inflow) using a flow phantom at two different concentrations (0.8 and 1.2 mmol l(-1)).
METHODS: A flow phantom was designed to produce three different flow rates at the same time. Theoretical flow was calculated by measuring the volumes of the phantom and dividing them by the time taken to fill these volumes. T(1) weighted turbo fast low-angle shot images were used to measure signal intensity (SI) change during the first bolus passage of the contrast medium through the phantom using linear phase-encoding acquisition.
RESULTS: The corrected experimental flow based on the technique shows a good agreement with the theoretical flow, where the flow rate is low at the two concentrations.
CONCLUSION: The T(1) weighted MRI technique after the two correction factors can be used to measure the absolute flow where the flow rate is low, such as in the capillaries. For measuring high flow rate (e.g. artery), additional correction factors should be considered.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20959366      PMCID: PMC3473463          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/18588668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  25 in total

1.  A simple method to improve image nonuniformity of brain MR images at the edges of a head coil.

Authors:  F B Mohamed; S Vinitski; S H Faro; H V Ortega; S Enochs
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Absolute renal blood flow quantification by dynamic MRI and Gd-DTPA.

Authors:  J P Vallée; F Lazeyras; H G Khan; F Terrier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Retrospective correction of MR intensity inhomogeneity by information minimization.

Authors:  B Likar; M A Viergever; F Pernus
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Quantitative cerebral blood flow measurement with dynamic perfusion CT using the vascular-pixel elimination method: comparison with H2(15)O positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Kohsuke Kudo; Satoshi Terae; Chietsugu Katoh; Masaki Oka; Tohru Shiga; Nagara Tamaki; Kazuo Miyasaka
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Perfusion measurements of the brain: using dynamic CT for the quantitative assessment of cerebral ischemia in acute stroke.

Authors:  E Klotz; M König
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Quantitative assessment of the ischemic brain by means of perfusion-related parameters derived from perfusion CT.

Authors:  M Koenig; M Kraus; C Theek; E Klotz; W Gehlen; L Heuser
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Dynamic-range compression in surface-coil MRI.

Authors:  R B Lufkin; T Sharpless; B Flannigan; W Hanafee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Image non-uniformity in magnetic resonance imaging: its magnitude and methods for its correction.

Authors:  B R Condon; J Patterson; D Wyper; A Jenkins; D M Hadley
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Blood flow: magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  W G Bradley; V Waluch
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Noninvasive measurement of absolute renal perfusion by contrast medium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Xavier Montet; Marko K Ivancevic; Jacques Belenger; Manuel Jorge-Costa; Sybille Pochon; Antoinette Pechère; François Terrier; Jean-Paul Vallée
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.