Literature DB >> 20958831

Combining shock reduction strategies to enhance ICD therapy: a role for computer modeling.

Kent J Volosin1, Derek V Exner, Mark S Wathen, Lou Sherfesee, Anthony P Scinicariello, Jeffrey M Gillberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop a computer model to test shock reduction strategies such as antitachycardia pacing and shock withholding for supraventricular rhythms, oversensing, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia.
BACKGROUND: While the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) can reduce mortality, inappropriate ICD shocks remain a limitation. Randomized trials provide evidence of efficacy, but they are not always practical. Computer models provide an alternative approach, and are particularly useful when evaluating multiple interventions.
METHODS: A computer model was developed using clinical data and validated in a large ICD data set (EMPIRIC). After validation, the model was applied to 736 adjudicated clinical episodes from the ICD arm of Sudden Cardiac Death Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT).
RESULTS: The shock reduction strategies hypothetically reduced the number of VT/VF shocked episodes in SCD-HeFT by an estimated 59% (from 952 observed to 395 modeled shocks, probability of >0.999) at detection duration settings (18 of 24 intervals). The percentage of patients experiencing inappropriate shocks over 5 years was decreased by 15% (23.5-8.4%), and the number of shocks for non-VT/VF episodes was decreased from 423 to 77 (82% reduction). The percentage of patients receiving shocks for VT/VF was reduced from 30.7% (SCD-HeFT) to 26.1% with the addition of ATP. Extended detection (24 of 32 or 30 of 40 intervals) showed modest additional improvement compared to 18 of 24 intervals.
CONCLUSION: Computer modeling is able to predict the results of a known clinical trial and demonstrate that shock reduction strategies have the potential to significantly reduce inappropriate and unnecessary ICD shocks versus the mandated programming used in SCD-HeFT.
© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20958831     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01918.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  4 in total

Review 1.  Optimal tachycardia programming in ICDs : Recommendations in the post-MADIT-RIT era.

Authors:  Carsten W Israel; Tatsiana Burmistrava
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2016-09

2.  Single-chamber ICD, single-zone therapy in primary and secondary prevention patients: the simpler the better?

Authors:  S González-Enríquez; F Rodríguez-Entem; V Expósito; C Castrillo-Bustamante; A Canteli; A Solloso; I Madrazo; J J Olalla
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing.

Authors:  Bruce L Wilkoff; Laurent Fauchier; Martin K Stiles; Carlos A Morillo; Sana M Al-Khatib; Jesœs Almendral; Luis Aguinaga; Ronald D Berger; Alejandro Cuesta; James P Daubert; Sergio Dubner; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; N A Mark Estes; Guilherme Fenelon; Fermin C Garcia; Maurizio Gasparini; David E Haines; Jeff S Healey; Jodie L Hurtwitz; Roberto Keegan; Christof Kolb; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Germanas Marinskis; Martino Martinelli; Mark McGuire; Luis G Molina; Ken Okumura; Alessandro Proclemer; Andrea M Russo; Jagmeet P Singh; Charles D Swerdlow; Wee Siong Teo; William Uribe; Sami Viskin; Chun-Chieh Wang; Shu Zhang
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2016-02-01

4.  Arrhythmic episodes in patients implanted with a cardioverter-defibrillator - results from the Prospective Study on Predictive Quality with Preferencing PainFree ATP therapies (4P).

Authors:  François Regoli; Denis Graf; Beat Schaer; Firat Duru; Peter Ammann; Lorenza Mangoni di S Stefano; Barbara Naegli; Haran Burri; Rainer Zbinden; Nazmi Krasniqi; Martin Fromer
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 2.298

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.