Literature DB >> 20956881

False negative and positive motor evoked potentials in one patient: is single motor evoked potential monitoring reliable method? A case report and literature review.

Jae-Young Hong1, Seung-Woo Suh, Hitesh N Modi, Chang-Yong Hur, Hae-Ryong Song, Jong Hoon Park.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A case report and literature review.
OBJECTIVE: To report a false negative and delayed positive motor-evoked potential (MEP) in 1 patient. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: An unreliable MEP can result in fatal outcomes because surgeons have recently begun to depend on the MEP for intraoperative decision-making.
METHODS: We report a case of a false MEP during scoliosis surgery that showed false negative and positive MEPs during a series of operations.
RESULTS: A 23-year-old man with a history of spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia presented with severe kyphoscoliosis. The initial neurologic examination did not reveal any neurologic abnormalities. Surgical correction and fusion were performed with transcranial MEP monitoring. During the entire procedure, the MEP did not reveal any signs of cord injury. However, lower limb paralysis and paresthesia was observed when the patient awakened. After 2 additional surgical procedures to recover the neurologic deficit, the MEP did not show any signs of cord injury but the patient's neurologic status had recovered slightly. At postoperative day 8, the neurologic status recovered, and a third operation was performed to fix the long rods. However, there were abnormal amplitudes in both lower limbs but the patient's neurologic status was almost normal.
CONCLUSION: From our experience of false negative and positive MEP in 1 patient, it is concluded that undesirable events can occur with use of MEP in scoliosis or other spinal surgery. Therefore, we warn the surgeons too heavily rely on the MEP monitoring, and propose a further prospective study as well as use of alternative method that can improve the reliability of single MEP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20956881     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d8fabb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring during posterior craniocervical distraction and realignment for congenital craniocervical anomaly.

Authors:  Chi Heon Kim; Jae Taek Hong; Chun Kee Chung; June Young Kim; Sung-Min Kim; Kwang-Woo Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Change in body surface temperature as an ancillary measurement to motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  J H Yang; S W Suh; Y-S Park; J-H Lee; B K Park; C H Ham; J W Choi
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Transient neurological deficit following midthoracic decompression for severe stenosis: a series of three cases.

Authors:  Fadi Taher; Darren R Lebl; Frank P Cammisa; David W Pinter; Dexter Y Sun; Federico P Girardi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Fiber-optic Monitoring of Spinal Cord Hemodynamics in Experimental Aortic Occlusion.

Authors:  Angela S Kogler; Thomas V Bilfinger; Robert M Galler; Rickson C Mesquita; Michael Cutrone; Steven S Schenkel; Arjun G Yodh; Thomas F Floyd
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Optical monitoring and detection of spinal cord ischemia.

Authors:  Rickson C Mesquita; Angela D'Souza; Thomas V Bilfinger; Robert M Galler; Asher Emanuel; Steven S Schenkel; Arjun G Yodh; Thomas F Floyd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.