Literature DB >> 20953798

Prey-mediated avoidance of an intraguild predator by its intraguild prey.

Ryan R Wilson1, Terry L Blankenship, Mevin B Hooten, John A Shivik.   

Abstract

Intraguild (IG) predation is an important factor influencing community structure, yet factors allowing coexistence of IG predator and IG prey are not well understood. The existence of spatial refuges for IG prey has recently been noted for their importance in allowing coexistence. However, reduction in basal prey availability might lead IG prey to leave spatial refuges for greater access to prey, leading to increased IG predation and fewer opportunities for coexistence. We determined how the availability of prey affected space-use patterns of bobcats (Lynx rufus, IG prey) in relation to coyote space-use patterns (Canis latrans, IG predators). We located animals from fall 2007 to spring 2009 and estimated bobcat home ranges and core areas seasonally. For each bobcat relocation, we determined intensity of coyote use, distance to water, small mammal biomass, and mean small mammal biomass of the home range during the season the location was collected. We built generalized linear mixed models and used Akaike Information Criteria to determine which factors best predicted bobcat space use. Coyote intensity was a primary determinant of bobcat core area location. In bobcat home ranges with abundant prey, core areas occurred where coyote use was low, but shifted to areas intensively used by coyotes when prey declined. High spatial variability in basal prey abundance allowed some bobcats to avoid coyotes while at the same time others were forced into more risky areas. Our results suggest that multiple behavioral strategies associated with spatial variation in basal prey abundance likely allow IG prey and IG predators to coexist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20953798     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-010-1797-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

Review 1.  Diet, morphology, and interspecific killing in carnivora.

Authors:  Emiliano Donadio; Steven W Buskirk
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 2.  Habitat structure affects intraguild predation.

Authors:  Arne Janssen; Maurice W Sabelis; Sara Magalhães; Marta Montserrat; Tessa van der Hammen
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Kernel density estimators of home range: smoothing and the autocorrelation red herring.

Authors:  John Fieberg
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Relationships between direct predation and risk effects.

Authors:  Scott Creel; David Christianson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Impact of intraguild predation and stage structure on simple communities along a productivity gradient.

Authors:  S D Mylius; K Klumpers; A M de Roos; L Persson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Optimal behavior: can foragers balance two conflicting demands?

Authors:  A Sih
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Food webs and intraguild predation: community interactions of a native mesocarnivore.

Authors:  Craig M Thompson; Eric M Gese
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.499

8.  Cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Choh; Tessa van der Hammen; Maurice W Sabelis; Arne Janssen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Does interference competition with wolves limit the distribution and abundance of coyotes?

Authors:  Kim Murray Berger; Eric M Gese
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.091

10.  Predator-hunting success and prey vulnerability: quantifying the spatial scale over which lethal and non-lethal effects of predation occur.

Authors:  Will Cresswell; Johan Lind; John L Quinn
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 5.091

View more
  3 in total

1.  Mammalian mesopredators on islands directly impact both terrestrial and marine communities.

Authors:  Justin P Suraci; Michael Clinchy; Liana Y Zanette; Christopher M A Currie; Lawrence M Dill
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Spatial interactions between sympatric carnivores: asymmetric avoidance of an intraguild predator.

Authors:  Shaun M Grassel; Janet L Rachlow; Christopher J Williams
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Differential Habitat Use or Intraguild Interactions: What Structures a Carnivore Community?

Authors:  Matthew E Gompper; Damon B Lesmeister; Justina C Ray; Jay R Malcolm; Roland Kays
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.